When I watched this movie, I originally thought that the plot should be very slow. I was afraid that I would not have the patience to watch it. But after watching it, I found that it was not as slow as I thought. The overall plot is not boring and the plot is relatively compact. The suspense part of this movie Although the clues or details given are not many, I think many people should have noticed an obvious detail. The cook said that she was illiterate and then took a piece of paper and said I think the housekeeper was killed. Here we start. I think there is something wrong with the cook, doesn't she know how to write if she lied? Or maybe the butler had colluded with her who gave her the slip of paper, and told her to give her money and let her do it, but the butler is a blind person who can write and read? Can a blind person write fluently? Then the detective went in and saw that the butler was dead. The butler seemed to be really dead. Then the butler was gone and only the clothes were left. After a while, the clothes were gone and the body was left. Who did it? The cook is obviously not, is the cook sitting outside, is there someone else? This kind of suspense film generally does not appear that a new person suddenly appears. Everyone present is not a problematic person but a person who has never been seen before. This should not be the case. Otherwise, the work is too vulgar and too bad, then yes. Mr. Twin? It may be Mr. Shuang, but he looks very short and very old. The housekeeper is an old man and a big man. Isn’t he tired of moving around? Can he do it? But he has the technology and it may be possible to do it, but Mr. Shuang has a lot of The cute guys appeared behind the deer head this time, he may not have so much time, so is it possible that the people in the restaurant sneaked in after the first few detectives went in? They might cheat and hide, right? , It is also possible that they sneaked in and lied and never left, but the detective who entered in front opened the door and came to the second restaurant, an empty restaurant, and then went back and reopened the door before returning to the original restaurant. No one is missing from everyone. If they entered later, they would have to go through the wrong door. How could they come back earlier than those who entered before, and no one else mentioned or suggested that they had sneaked in. Afterwards, I wondered if it would be a housekeeper. In fact, at the beginning I suspected that the housekeeper had something wrong. It was the housekeeper deliberately. When the detective went in to see him, he just pretended to be dead. He did it himself because he was not dead, but the detective said that his pulse was gone and his breathing was gone. How did he do it, could he be in collusion with the detective? Later, the cook disappeared. The fierce detective found the wax dummy. I wondered if the butler was also a wax figure. The butler was not dead. In fact, I was watching and wondering if everything was just a double. Mr.'s farce, he and the housekeeper are in the same group, or the cook are all in the same group. For him, this is my game. I am playing it. You senior detectives have been fooled by me! Hahahaha. When Mr. Shuang died, I was wondering if it was he who made the switch and killed himself. He was just playing, playing with these detectives, so that they could not find the murderer and worry about it. Could this also be a fake? People, in the ending, Mr. Shuang was not dead and reversed, or it was the housekeeper. The housekeeper was the murderer, but Mr. Shuang said that he would die tonight. Why is he so sure? Why does he know that the housekeeper will kill him? The collusion was done, he asked the butler to kill him, but then the detective talked about the possibility and asked him whether he killed himself with a mechanism. The characters in the movie said this, and they may also deliberately help the audience. Coming out of this conjecture implies that the audience are very clever, but unfortunately it is not that way. It is not that simple. I know you have guessed the possibility. Of course, it is possible that the detective is just like us, just speculating and reasoning. Then the detectives The infighting started, and I started to point out who had the motive for the murder, as if everyone could be the murderer. The director had asked us to suspect those three people before, and then he started to ask us to guess which of the five of them was the murderer? I think it might not be that simple or it would be too vulgar. At the end, he was mocking the cliché plots of those novels. How could the director make everything really that vulgar? So I think the ending should be reversed. In fact, at the beginning, the detectives and their assistants didn’t have much room for the crime and the hint of the motive. Of course not everyone is suspicious. Three people temporarily left our sights with the detectives. We don’t know what they did in those hours. Even if it was ten seconds, they might have done something. Although everything seemed to be less important in the end, the first one was the detective whose lanky partner was an elegant rich lady. He went to the bathroom and did not come out. Then the other detective left first, and he opened the door and entered nobody’s. After the restaurant, I went back to open the restaurant and entered the original restaurant for the second time. Then they chatted for a while. At this time, the fat detective said to give them a demonstration. He went in and knocked three times, but the thin and tall detective came out. Why did he wash his hands for so long? Why did he go during this time? , Then the fat detective went in and didn't know what he encountered. After a while, everyone saw him wearing the housekeeper's clothes and looked panicked. Who put it on him? Is it Mr. Shuang's prank again? , What did he go in for? , Did he meet the butler and became a collusion with the butler, did he go in and kill Mr. Shuang, deliberately put on the butler’s clothes to panic and confuse everyone, and then the Chinese detective asked his Japanese son to deal with the corpse, and then all Everyone left the restaurant, and only the Japanese guy was left. What would he have time to do?
Afterwards, I actually thought that the chef was dressed as Mr. Double. They look similar. The disappearance of the chef should be caused by Mr. Double to make her disappear. It is true that the chef is deaf and dumb. How could he invite such a person to come? Is it just because it’s cheap that you don’t have to pay too much salary? Finally, a Chinese detective discovered that a person was using a pen to write a person’s name, and that person was the housekeeper. At this time, I started to think again, I was surprised, is it really a housekeeper? Sure enough, he could see, did the chef join him and his group? He wrote the paper that the chef took. Is this his purpose? Killed the detectives and then took the money to leave, but when he stood up, I found that he was shorter. Isn’t the butler very tall before? And he said a good-natured mother, just like Mr. Shuang, I wonder if there will be more What a reversal, as expected, there was a reversal again. He tore off his mask. He was Mr. Twin. Everything was designed by Mr. Twin. Mr. Twin became the final winner. He successfully teased every detective. He won, and then the detectives. They are all gone. At this time, I think I should be the housekeeper. The cook will come out and laugh with Mr. Shuang. They won. They are all good actors. They are too good. But Mr. Shuang opened the mask again and turned into a woman. After all, I still couldn’t guess the ending. I thought about many, many possibilities. The ending was still unexpected. I admit that it was the director who won. Mr. Shuang teased all the detectives. The director teased us. You are really big Funny ghost, the ending reversal is admirable, the director is you win
Tear off the last mask, this woman seems to be a cook. I thought that the cook was a double pretend, but I didn’t expect that the double was the one who was pretended to be. It was the cook who pretended to be Mr. Shuang. I didn’t expect it, but the housekeeper. ? The housekeeper is also a cook. It shouldn’t be. The housekeeper is taller than the cook and appeared at the same time as the cook. The housekeeper should be real. The housekeeper is not dead. This is just a farce. None of the detectives died, the housekeeper. Is there any reason to die? So in the original house, only the cook and the housekeeper were planned from the beginning. The housekeepers had always followed the arrangement of the cook, but I think he realized that he didn’t know that the cook was Mr. Shuang, why did the cook. To enter the door, pretending to be true, it was the new cook, and the butler went to scold the cook and let him get out of your way. You were fired. Is it because the scene is misleading or deliberately misleading? Can the audience judge it? Maybe the butler really doesn’t know that the cook girl is just a potential character but suddenly emerges as a key figure, which is unexpected to everyone. An inconspicuous cook girl is just because of the front and The scene with the housekeeper has a sense of existence, and it is pushed into the plot with details and clues to become a key reversal role. Later, the cook told the housekeeper that he would start planning for the housekeeper to hide. Why didn’t he say in advance that he had to pretend to be a cook Play with the butler and then tell yourself the butler, maybe, maybe the butler never knows, maybe Mr. Shuang is a real person, Mr. Shuang was killed by the character of the cook a long time ago, and then the cook pretends to be Mr. Shuang and deliberately let the housekeeper know that she is It’s just his plan for the new chef to start a series of farce with communication difficulties. He deceived everyone, including the butler, including us. He didn’t deliberately pretend that they didn’t know a chef and deliberately played tricks on the butler to mislead the audience. He designed it. Speaking of this, I feel that the butler may really be dead. The cook does not intend to continue to pretend to be Mr. Shuang. After using the butler to start her own life, it may also be to lock the butler. The dead one is indeed a Dummy, it's also possible...
The murderer is more than one person. There are too many and too many possibilities. I think this old movie is really too brain-burning and too powerful. For a person like me with insufficient IQ, this reversal is really amazing.
View more about Murder by Death reviews
