Beautify the squeeze of marriage on women

Jana 2022-01-09 08:03:04

At the beginning of the movie, the tacit understanding and mutual affection of the old couple are warm and moving, in stark contrast to the gloom that finally revealed that the husband Kasman seized the talent of his wife Jon. It is precisely because of this strong contrast that the ending feels unreasonable.

In reality, Kasman is indeed an untalented, narcissistic, grumpy, uncontrollable, low-ethical, and selfish man (there are too many details, such as persuading a pregnant daughter to drink, such as taunting the harshness of the barrage offered by a lawyer For example, when I first met Jon, who was still a student, he seduced her, such as using Jon to help him take care of his and ex-wife’s children, such as hooking up with young and beautiful photographers at any time, and neglecting and degrading his son’s talent)

It’s really hard to imagine what has supported Jon to endure eight hours of writing every day for decades, take care of his children, endure Kasman’s vulgar temper, and endure the humiliation of his derailment at any time... such a man Indeed, he was completely unworthy of Jon. The one who supported her until she was old, could it be that the so-called life cycle is only a few months of love at first sight? Is it because Kasman said that there are two children?

Isn't this argument a natural excuse for squeezing women under the cloak of marriage?

Of course, whether they are dependent or habitual for several decades together, Kasman is indeed very caring about Jon. When he was old, Jon was worried about Kasman’s heart disease. After Kasman passed away, Jon The maintenance of his reputation can be understood. Even the limitations of the environment for women's development at that time forced Jon to write in the name of Kasman, and perhaps even made Jon accept this injustice from the bottom of his heart.

The biggest problem with this movie is the Chinese translation of the name-virtuous wife. The name of the movie is just the wife, but it is ironic to translate it as a good wife! There is a kind of shameless complacency in taking advantage of women and complimenting her as a virtuous.

View more about The Wife reviews

Extended Reading
  • Christop 2022-03-15 09:01:05

    Two and a half stars. The movie saved by the performance, if it weren’t for Glenn Close’s cool and outstanding interpretation, would be no different from the few literary films adapted by McEwan last year. A simple "wife has been her husband silently for decades." The result of the "Gunner" story is really as simple as the first glance. The plot of sudden death after winning the Nobel Prize in Literature is really an old-fashioned drama that the Nobel Prize winner can't write. For female characters His attitude is both ambiguous and vague, and the discussion on married life is only superficial. The topic of feminism is even more evasive. The ending is like a powerless compromise. The director’s level is in sharp contrast with the film’s performance level, which is almost catastrophic. .

  • Max 2022-01-09 08:03:04

    A woman’s mild resistance was exchanged for some kind of victory, although it was a hasty ending

The Wife quotes

  • Joan Castleman: I can't do it anymore, Joe. I can't do it. I can't take it. I can't take the humiliation of holding your coat and arranging your pills and picking the crumbs out of your beard and being shoved aside with all the other wives to talk about some goddamn shopping trip while you, while you say to all the, the gathering sycophants that your wife doesn't write! Your wife, who just won the Nobel Prize!

    Joe Castleman: So, if I'm such an insensitive and talentless fucking piece of shit, why the fuck did you marry me?

  • Joan Castleman: There's nothing more dangerous than a writer whose feelings have been hurt.