Seven points affirmed that two male and female starring performances arrested people.
This film must not be viewed as "The Shawshank's Redemption", but when I finished brushing my teeth, it reminded me of two big news in the past two years. One was the case of Amber Guyger, a policewoman in Dallas who killed a black man by mistake but was forgiven by the deceased’s brother in the name of God. The other was the British girl Shamima Begum, who joined a Muslim country in her early years, applied to return to the UK and became the first person in British history to be deprived of her citizenship. . The brother of the deceased in the first case said, "Because I know what (brother) hopes most is...you can leave your life to God to decide." Before the ruling of the second case, the girl faced the question that the BBC remembered and said okay, I apologized to the innocent people who died in the Manchester bombing... But those who fought with IS said otherwise. Going back to this movie, the climax of the whole film is undoubtedly the first court statement of the male protagonist, "I have no confidence in the police and the judiciary of my country... This is not the case in Germany, let alone the United States... I never believe that I will be locked up under the American judicial system for eight years without trial... I want to forgive, because my "lord" means this... In Arabic, freedom and forgiveness are the same words." The conclusion is Human rights lawyers fight for justice but don’t care about people; suspects live for their beliefs but are saved by the secular life of Germany; soldiers fight for missions but find no evidence; assistant lawyers use goodness as evidence but seem to follow the waves of duckweed move.
We will eventually pay the price for our beliefs (missing), whether it's endless jail time, the ever-shortening Christmas invitation list, or the criticism from colleagues and family — it has to be that way.
View more about The Mauritanian reviews
