Let me write an ideological fable:
The industrial revolution drove farmers out of the land;
Traveling all the way, you can choose the factory to be raised, the capitalist gives carrots, lifeless, and there are traps outside the factory;
Finally found the promised land in the legend (luckily there are no natives in this land);
Then found out that there were no human and reproductive resources;
Attempt to liberate resources from a certain farm, but the place has plenty of military virtues and failed to succeed;
It was found that the military government on another piece of land (totalism/feudalism/incivilization) had manpower and resources;
And these resources have opinions on the original system;
Successfully abducted resources;
With the help of sufficient methods to reduce dimensionality and combat (dogs and white birds: guns, germs and steel), the resources and territories are protected.
problem:
1 The winner is justice, or the right to speak is justice? For example, did Yang Guo and Xiaolongnv's use of the sword in Unfeeling Valley infringe on property rights?
2 If there are oppressed or dissidents in a government, can it be inferred that the government is injustice?
In my opinion, it is difficult to say justice to systematic oppression: for example, the serf system in Tibetan areas before liberation is an abomination; under a very small number of political and religious systems, serfs and women have no basic human rights or right to choose.
View more about Watership Down reviews
