Most of the evidence in the story is insufficient, and he didn't find much evidence. It was Polo inferred by himself, but the strange thing is that the murderers did not confess themselves without any evidence to identify them. Because I have only seen Conan and the detective Sherlock before, Conan focuses on key evidence, which makes it impossible for the murderer to admit his criminal behavior, and Conan pays attention to the reasoning process. Polo’s reasoning process is very short and weak, so from In these respects, this drama is not as exciting as Detective Conan. In the penultimate episode, The Mystery of Plum K, it was the female star who accidentally killed the director or the producer. Even if the female star didn't intend to kill, she also committed manslaughter, but Polo actually concealed the truth! Conan will always only tell the truth and will not conceal the result. The law should decide how to sentence, not the detective who can shield the prisoner. I really can't bear this. Is this the personality of Detective Polo? I don't like Conan much, but I feel that this drama is really poor in many aspects. Some of these stories are definitely good, after all, they are so classic. But the content of the case is relatively simple, the plot is not tortuous, so the case is not considered exciting. In contrast, Conan's case is more exciting than this, not to mention the detective Sherlock's case, it is too exciting, and the case is more complicated. So on the whole, the show is flat, well-formed, and unsuccessful.
View more about Poirot reviews
