Protecting the environment and caring for the earth. I would like to look at this issue from two perspectives. On the one hand, this is a scientific issue. To protect the environment is to protect ourselves. This is not just a slogan. Aside from morality, it is essentially a scientific statement that is indeed established. Human development is inseparable from the development and utilization of natural resources (perhaps this is the source). It will inevitably lead to impacts on other species, various natural environments, and the overall nature. It is beneficial to humans, but it must be destructive to the whole outside of humans (natural resources are under certain time and space scales). Is limited). Of course, this kind of damage is also relative to human beings and other organisms, and the ecological environment at a certain scale. For the evolution of the behemoth of the earth, this kind of damage may seem insignificant. From this perspective, environmental protection is a scientific issue. What is the meaning? That is: whether human beings’ endless pursuit of the ultimate goal of technology and even society—infinite resources (relative to human population), absolute freedom and equality—can be completed before mankind is destroyed by nature. This is a very ultimate question, a question about how far human beings can go as a higher creature in the universe who does not know whether it is really lonely or not. On the other hand, it is a moral question. It is undeniable that with the development of the human superstructure and the evolution of spiritual civilization, there are indeed values that support environmental protection, which stems from a love for the vast nature. Perhaps at the starting point of mankind, the only goal is to survive and multiply, but under the long washing of history, these values beyond the most original biological value have also become a real spiritual need. Generally speaking, environmental protection includes the above two. All aspects. Ignoring the former and denying the objective needs of human survival and development means denying the past, denying man's initial biological instincts, denying mankind's journey from small dark corners in the food chain to the magnificent history of high-rise buildings, science and art. Ignoring the latter and denying that the spiritual needs that are gradually formed in the evolution of human civilization and that are independent and connected to the material basis mean denying the future, denying the more interesting and necessary evolution beyond the development of material life or dialectics. Understand and thoroughly understand that this is the developmental needs of resource development and utilization, and the unity of opposites between the survival needs of human beings to protect themselves in nature and the spiritual needs of protecting the environment. How to control this balance determines the end of the "spiral" evolution. Whether it is the sea of stars or self-destruction is complicated. As a species, human beings are not united. In the context of multiple countries standing in the forest of the world, military, political, economic and other factors have their tentacles. Reached into the big dyeing vat of "environmental protection". There is an urgent need to come up with good countermeasures in the face of contradictions, but they have their own internal positions and are constrained by various factors (this can be seen from the dialogue between Chai Jing and Academician Ding Zhongli on carbon emissions). I think this kind of unanimity and conflict of interests, the subtle and extremely complex network of relationships, is environmental protection, and it is also the universal nature of any problem in the world. As for the ultimate destination of the overall development of mankind? Is the day that everyone pursues, is it yesterday or tomorrow of the day of destruction? I have no idea. This question is too complicated and too difficult. Now I can only choose to believe and continue to search for the answer———————— When I watched documentaries, I think of this question again. The diversity of ecology may be more than the above two meanings. , It also provides an excellent sample for human cognition of biology, nature, and the world (application of biology, bionic technology; aesthetic research, research and questioning on the essence of life...) Of course, all strange nature, In fact, it is a very magnificent existence. Its vastness and magic should make us feel grateful and awe in itself
View more about Our Planet reviews
