I have a bad habit. After watching a movie that I don’t know very well, I don’t want to watch it several times to understand or find information to understand the story behind the movie, but to read the film reviews first, and get myself from others’ evaluations. However, the initial attitude is not always similar, so I want to write something.
Regarding political movies, I seem to be able to watch them relatively smoothly. No matter how many shortcomings others may have, as long as I can get a little bit clear and understand something, it is a good movie for me, after all. Everything other than politics is nothing more than serving politics.
After the 9/11 incident in the United States, the so-called torture covered by the strengthening of law enforcement, and the Senate obsessed with investigating the EIT incident. I can probably understand the CIA’s approach. After a terrorist attack, the public’s emotions need to be calmed down, work ability needs to be proven, unscrupulous in order to obtain intelligence, and the development of the situation is difficult to control. The behavior itself.
I think of what it said in "Yes, the Minister" that the official denial is not to deny things that the public knows, but to protect the correctness of the government. Probably this is the meaning, so the report cannot be made public, because transparency itself is the opposite of politics, because authority cannot be questioned.
For five years, in a basement, faced with huge pressure torture materials and life out of touch with ordinary life, no one thought that Daniel could dig so deep. In the beginning, the principle of not allowing personal emotions and personal positions was gradually broken by the discovered truth. Senator asked Dan whether he was working for her or reporting work. In the end, he wanted to show his ambition and heart. Ethical values and work.
In the end Senator said that the report should be made public, mistakes should be made public, and responsibility should be borne. After being made public, there may be riots, which cannot be prevented but it is not a reason to evade responsibility. The United States should communicate with those countries that only make reports but do not dare to make them public. Not the same, the world should be shown the self-confidence of the United States. After that period, I was really touched, because not every country has the courage to publicly admit its mistakes, and not every country has strong national self-confidence. But the final result only confirmed the authenticity and correctness of the report, and the punishment that Washington said was not implemented, which is rather ironic.
After all, ideal and reality are more than a little different. After all, the world is not black and white, and politics in particular is full of concealed lies and falsehoods. So even if the systems are different, the problems are all because of people after all, but they are similar. But maybe there will always be someone who insists on something like Dan, who is making everything better slowly.
View more about The Report reviews
