In a modern civilized society, whether torture can be used during interrogation is really a deep question, but the filming of this film is really an idiot.
A central argument of the film is that enhanced interrogation techniques are of no use and no intelligence can be obtained. I still remember the original words in the film, "Among the 119 people who used enhanced interrogation techniques, it didn't work for anyone." To get this conclusion, the person who wrote this report and the filmmaker are really idiots . Torture will surely make many people who didn't speak, so it must be useful. This is common sense in human society for thousands of years and does not require any psychological evidence. This is also one of the important reasons for the CIA's great resistance to this report in the film.
Relatively speaking, enhanced interrogation techniques can be regarded as humane. Its principle is to make people feel drowning and claustrophobic. It is more psychologically oppressing the interrogator. Compared with traditional interrogation methods, the latter is more benevolent. Irreversible damage to the body, such as nail removal, whipping, etc. However, enhanced interrogation techniques are still torture and should not be used in a civilized society.
But can it be used for terrorists? We must know that these terrorists can let their own people wear vests to attack. This is their fanaticism and perseverance. Let these people speak, will civilized interrogation methods be useful? On the other hand, what is the moral bottom line of these people? It is possible to send pilots to death in a cage, behead the hostages, and broadcast live to the whole world. Do they need to use such civilized methods with those who adopt the moral standards of the Middle Ages? Should they communicate in a language they understand, that is, torture?
The "Strategic Special Forces" filmed very well. They caught a terrorist. The kid put a nuclear bomb and it was going to explode in a few hours. The cruel methods of interrogation led to disputes and divisions. At this time, the nuclear bomb exploded. At this time, my feeling is that this kid should have been cut long ago. If you don't believe him, he won't say anything. In other words, for the benefit of most people, uncivilized methods can be used to treat terrorists.
But here comes the problem:
1. A lot of uncertainty: First of all: Are you sure you caught the right person? This person may be a civilian. You have to know that even in a peaceful city, there are times when the wrong person is caught. Secondly, maybe he has really said all about it. , Or really don’t know on this issue, how do you tell? Again, is there really an imminent crisis to happen, and cruel methods must be used?
2. Harm to the interrogator: Many people in modern society dare not kill, let alone doing this kind of thing will cause psychological shadows
3. Suppression of new technologies: If information can be easily obtained through torture, no one is willing to research and make breakthroughs with other advanced technological methods
These angles can be written, but it’s a pity that I wrote such a brainless cool white open
View more about The Report reviews
