Was the second episode bad? Just closer to us

Allen 2022-05-29 22:37:18

What I saw in the second episode was the helplessness of people's attention in front of social networks. Regarding the identity of the male protagonist in the play, the final result of the police investigation back and forth is not as good as the information obtained by a COO who taps a few keyboards in front of the company computer. This shows the power of the Internet, and I feel the gap from the superintendent’s awkward expression. Searching for information and investigating evidence collection, in the impression, this should be the superpower of the police, but it becomes not worth mentioning in front of these network experts. I still remember the words that the COO said to the superintendent on the phone, "Do you understand what I'm talking about?" There was a hint of arrogance in the self-confidence. Billy, the founder of the second half of the company, also said that their abilities are comparable to the "God Mode." This can show that only they know how powerful these elites are to control and influence social networks. However, such a powerful influence also comes from an entire "dopamine target" scientific research team. I think this is an aspect that the film wants to express. In fact, people cannot completely control their acceptance of information or things. Because there is an entire team of experts behind these social networks, they are experts in human behavior. So in the face of these designed products like Weibo, Douyin and other artificial intelligence in our lives, can our actions really get rid of their influence? I find it really difficult. The protagonist's long-term behavior is affected by the "fragmented" software, so that one second before the accident, his eyes subconsciously glanced at the phone because of the phone message, which caused him to dodge. This is its "powerful" point, and stealing subconsciously is sometimes extremely important. The founder of the company, Billy Bower, who knows this well, needs to take a vacation every once in a while to cultivate his body and mind on a mountain that is not affected by any technological products. He calls it "technological detoxification". This is another sharp contrast, and a person who founded and mastered all of this shunned all of it. He knows best that what we ignore is actually the most important. So in the end, he hoped to compensate the male protagonist with a feeling of guilt. In the film, he and the male protagonist have something in common. They hate the high technology that subconsciously takes away their attention. The software company used by half of the people in the world has brought countless benefits to people, but this "friendly" company thinks about money and image risk assessment at a moment of life-threatening. On the other hand, in front of the grieving mother who lost her daughter, the company seemed to protect the privacy of the user and did not give her daughter’s account password. However, as a friend of Billy’s phone call, it became a matter of course to mobilize the user’s privacy information, which made people feel a little ironic. mean. The hero's grief left him breathless. He really needs to vent, but he can't help it. Everything comes from a picture of a dog A glance of knowledge. This is just a small action, but is it really "small"? Can it really be avoided easily? Message reminder” That moment suddenly magnified several times in my mind and became extremely heavy. After watching the second episode, I felt that all this was not absurd and not far away. On the contrary, it was extremely real.

View more about Striking Vipers reviews