From the perspective of commercial films, imitation games are successful. At least it can make all people who have not seen Turing's biography before and know nothing about him will be moved to tears when they walk out of the movie theater, and they will be embarrassed at his miserable life. Well, when I first walked out of the cinema, I felt almost like this. From the perspective of the storyline, The Imitation Game deserves to be named the "Best Hollywood Screenplay yet to be Adopted" in 2011. It draws on history and is both fashionable and contemporary. It is touching and sensational, with jokes and depth. In addition to the above, the British style is not lost. Compared with the Hollywood style with too strong male hormones, it also has the delicate and plain of the British Isles, focusing on individuals who did not intend to sacrifice their lives for the country, but his pursuit of self and knowledge inadvertently saved all mankind and the United Kingdom. However, the state apparatus did not give him the recognition he deserved, but persecuted him to death because of his personal sexual orientation. Through the full description of Turing's sexual orientation and the positive affirmation of his sexual orientation, the British Empire once again completed its atonement for itself in a film. The mainstream establishment and the non-mainstream anti-establishment system are so harmoniously integrated into a whole, only the British can do such a seamless job. If you just want to watch a good film, tailor-made for the impact of the Oscars, but you want to hide it better, unlike Zhang Yimou's blatant words, you can close the window when you see this film review here. Especially considering Benedict’s great acting skills in the film, Matthew Goodie’s 360-degree beauty without dead ends, and finally being able to see the less annoying Keria Knightly in a film, I don’t think a hundred dollars It's really worth the fare! Then if someone with a heart is watching the movie and is deeply moved by Turing's ups and downs in his life, and looking through his biography with curiosity, he will find that this director is not only a cute storyteller, but also a big liar! Of course, it is normal for literary and artistic works adapted from historical figures to be recreated or distorted to a certain extent in order to create dramatic effects. For example, in order to create some twists and turns for the boring work of cracking passwords, Hugh played by Matthew Goodie Alexander's writing as Turing's mortal enemy, or the admiral as an unkind old stubbornness, these are all understandable artistic processes. However, some drastic changes made by the director to Turing's life and character in order to create a bloody plot are not only unnecessary and only reflect the director's vulgar level, but also reveal the director's full malice, intentionally or unintentionally. First of all, the film deliberately portrays Turing as a high IQ and low EQ, like Sheldon Cooper and the BBC version of Sheldon with autistic and even antisocial personality tendencies. However, in real life, Turing is indeed a genius with A bit of poisonous tongue, but because of his poisonous tongue and genius, he has always been popular with colleagues. Bletchley attracted a group of fans. The complementarity of his and Hugh Alexander's personalities did not make them guilty, but helped them learn from each other's strengths. cooperate. If you want to create something weird about Turing's character, why doesn't the director choose to wear a gas mask to get off work because of pollen allergies, or always rework with a jacket over pajamas? Secondly, the film does not have much to say about Turing’s homosexuality. On the one hand, it describes him as a gay who is afraid of social pressure. On the other hand, it focuses his homosexuality on his loyalty and unforgettable first love. superior. In fact, Turing never concealed his sexual orientation. He would come out to his colleagues whenever he had the opportunity, and even told him his true sexual orientation on the second day of his engagement with Joan; and after Christopher passed away, Since college, his love history has been eloquent, and he does not live forever at the innocent sixteen-year-old like in the movie. Maybe this kind of kitsch adaptation is purely to cater to the tastes of the general public, but why do our mainstream films repeatedly condone these tastes? Why is it that when it comes to scientists with high IQ, A Beautiful Mind, Big Bang must appear A stereotype like Theory? Can a person with high IQ not have high EQ? Is it because a person is admired for academic and intellectual achievements, is destined to die alone in daily life? Could this be the "God is fair" that contemporary people can accept and understand? And this movie, which focuses on the protagonist’s comrade identity, is even so important that a fictional plot runs through the entire film to bring the three main lines together, but it is impossible to face the protagonist’s comrade identity. Let Joan grab so many emotional scenes may be out of plot considerations, but the director’s homosexual tendency towards the protagonist in the film is not even as calm as Turing. The preference of Turing for the same sex that he outlines is due to childhood shadows and first love. The plot is established by these pseudo-psychological clichés. Turing here is not frankly interested in the same sex, but because of a wrong coincidence, he just happens to rely on the same sex, but has no chance to get normal expression and guidance, and is affected by these. , Which led to the germination of same-sex sexual orientation. This sensational rationalization makes me feel sick. Compared with the director’s desire to express Turing, who lives forever in his heart after losing Christopher and holding back tears and pretending to be strong, Turing looks more real without these dog blood and pretense. And cute. What moved me the most in the film was the paragraph Turing said when talking about his thesis: "Of course, machines cannot think like humans. Machines and humans are not the same. What's interesting is that if something is thinking about you Different ways, does that mean it can’t think? You see, we allow all kinds of differences between humans, you like strawberries, I hate skating, you cry when you watch sad movies, I’m allergic to pollen, different tastes, different What is the meaning of choice? If we don’t question the different ways of thinking because of the different ways of brain operation, we treat another person’s brain like this, why can’t we embrace a brain made of copper wire and steel? What about the same attitude?" I think for those who have watched this film, this passage may want to ask, "Geniuses may be different from ordinary people, but does that mean that geniuses are not like ordinary people? Live and enjoy life the same? Some people are reasonable, some people are good at dancing, and some are complete bastards. We don't question whether those people are normal people, but can we treat a different mind with the same ordinary mind What about the geniuses?" "Homosexuals and heterosexuals may be different, but does it mean that homosexuals are not the same as ordinary people? To love? Some people enjoy the joy of meeting by the water, some people are always fascinated by the freshness of love, some people believe in holding hands and growing old together, but we will not question whether those people are normal people, but can we use the same ordinary Does your heart treat someone who is in love with a person of the same gender? "The answer reflected in this movie is sad. Maybe we can finally put homosexuals on the table and talk about it, but we still feel from the bottom of our bones that they cannot love like we do. Geniuses who are different from us are still needed. Low EQ and autism are labelled; people who are different from our sexual orientation still need to use a set of pseudo-psychological clichés to analyze his sexual orientation motivation and rationalize his sexual orientation. Because, from the bottom of the heart, The director of this film is unwilling and unable to calmly understand Turing, and all kinds of kitsch may reflect the true face of the public. Some people say that Turing's passion for machine artificial intelligence actually reflects his own life in society. He has never felt that he is the same as other human beings. When he studied and how to simulate human brain thinking, he was also thinking about how to live like normal people. Perhaps from this point. In terms of Christopher plot without dog blood, Turing’s lonely life and collapse are also understandable, and Benedict’s performance in that segment is only through sad eyes, reflecting a depth that is unattainable in the movie. , And the depth of real Turing’s thoughts is far beyond what this commercial film can reflect. In Turing’s biography, the author writes that this society has never grappled to Turing’s unconformism. In this film, I Seeing the truth of this sentence, the society did not understand his unconformism, but just tried to extract some parts of his unconformism that the current society has begun to accept, interpret it in a confomist way, and express its own opinions. Unconfomist tolerance. After watching the film, some people said they didn’t know what the film wanted to talk about, whether it was a genius or a homosexual. I said stop making trouble. This film is just a typical British theme movie, reflecting In order to commemorate the 70th anniversary of the victory of the anti-fascist war, the British confession script was used to atone for their sins, and to establish the righteous and sacred image of the British Empire. Tu The ring is just a popular element borrowed to cross the bridge. This has been reflected in the end of the film. There is no apple by the bed, no Turing who committed suicide by poisoning. Only after World War II, the colleagues of Bletchley Park, shoulder to shoulder and arm in arm, personally put years of painstaking efforts into the fire to watch. They turned to ashes, the firelight reflected their young faces, with a gratified smile, shining with happiness, like an underground party after the victory of the revolution, with success and retreat, deeply hiding merit and fame. Of course, I still strongly recommend this movie. It is rare that there is a set of mainstream movies that can present the great contribution of a homosexual to human society in a way that the general public can understand and understand. To paraphrase a comment from a netizen, all homophobics, every word of homophobia and homophobia you typed out would never become a reality if it weren't for the anonymous contribution of this homosexual. I suggest that those who call for the boycott of Apple because of Cook’s coming out, and the boycott of Starbucks because of Starbucks’ support for gay rights, after watching this video, quickly close their computers and throw them into the trash. No, in order to express their righteous indignation, the most It’s a fire, let the fire light reflect your face full of justice, just like the end of the film, watching the blazing fire with a happy smile, singing loudly, from now on, only use bamboo slips and silk. , Hidden merit and fame. Colleagues in Park, shoulder to shoulder and arm in arm, personally put years of hard work into the fire and watched them turn to ashes. The light of the fire reflects their young faces, with a gratified smile, shining with happiness, like a revolution. After the victory, the underground party is general, retreats after accomplishing its deeds and hiding its merits and fame deeply. Of course, I still strongly recommend this movie. It is rare that there is a set of mainstream movies that can show the great contribution of a homosexual to human society in a way that the general public can understand and understand. To paraphrase a comment from a netizen, all homophobics, every word of homophobia and homophobia you typed out would never become a reality if it weren't for the anonymous contribution of this homosexual. I suggest that those who call for the boycott of Apple because of Cook’s coming out, and the boycott of Starbucks because of Starbucks’ support for gay rights, after watching this video, quickly close their computers and throw them into the trash. No, in order to express their righteous indignation, the most It’s a fire, let the fire light reflect your face full of justice, just like the end of the film, watching the blazing fire with a happy smile, singing loudly, from now on, only use bamboo slips and silk. , Hidden merit and fame. Colleagues in Park, shoulder to shoulder and arm in arm, personally put years of hard work into the fire and watched them turn to ashes. The light of the fire reflects their young faces, with a gratified smile, shining with happiness, like a revolution. After the victory, the underground party is general, retreats after accomplishing its deeds and hiding its merits and fame deeply. Of course, I still strongly recommend this movie. It is rare that there is a set of mainstream movies that can show the great contribution of a homosexual to human society in a way that the general public can understand and understand. To paraphrase a comment from a netizen, all homophobics, every word of homophobia and homophobia you typed out would never become a reality if it weren't for the anonymous contribution of this homosexual. I suggest that those who call for the boycott of Apple because of Cook’s coming out, and the boycott of Starbucks because of Starbucks’ support for gay rights, after watching this video, quickly close their computers and throw them into the trash. No, in order to express their righteous indignation, the most It’s a fire, let the fire light reflect your face full of justice, just like the end of the film, watching the blazing fire with a happy smile, singing loudly, from now on, only use bamboo slips and silk. , Hidden merit and fame.
View more about The Imitation Game reviews
