The film shows us another evil.
Two handsome teenagers politely knocked on the door of the villa on the grounds of borrowing eggs. Then, before the head of the household fully recognized the situation, they first knocked down the male owner, and then slowly took the house like a cat and mouse. They all played to death.
In fact, the previous ones are all okay. The male lead is a family of three. Although the performance is somewhat mentally retarded, I think it is probably because they did not associate such a gentle person with abnormality and viciousness.
If the story is bad, it's in the setting, your juvenile pervert is perverted, why are you superpowered, why can you rewind, no wonder you are so unhurried. You have such a god-defying bug setting, how to play this game, and a unilaterally abused game is really boring at all. What do you want to express, express that you can play with the audience.
Although the hostess's family of three seem to be mentally retarded and basically a mortal ending, they can hold back. If you had known that you had such a buggy setting for rewinding, then the hostess's family committed suicide early in the morning, saving you from torture.
If the director wants to express the total fatalism and despair, and still use the name "funny game", where is it funny? Isn't this a bad movie?
View more about Funny Games reviews
