Missing at the age of five and living in the forest for six years. Even if Pete's language skills are still there, it will never exceed the age of five. Robinson can make a Friday to maintain communication, but Pete will not. I even feel that he is not seriously nourished. Bad is a miracle. What does he eat to survive? The director skipped this point. She didn't even tell us what Elliot eats for a living. The only explanation is that this is a children's film and does not need to be logically rigorous.
I don't even know where Pete's tree climbing skills came from. It was definitely not taught by Elliot. Not all children in the forest are good at climbing trees, right? Taishan was raised by apes, so naturally he has to learn. Where is Pete? Several times I have used a tree to show Elliot's cuteness, then how did you talk about Pete's agility? Or since the audience has not performed for six years, the audience should make up for it by themselves?
Humans are not friendly animals to dragons, so the unconditional acceptance of Pete is just because children are cute. When Pete disappeared, Elliot looked around, went to Grace's house, saw the happy bedtime story, and then walked away sadly. You repeat this is a dragon, this delicate emotion, this kind of "you are more suitable to be with them, I still walk away silently, although I am reluctant, but this is your best home." Qiong Yao routine, It actually describes a species that is not even a primate.
Grace claims to be the protector of the forest, and when her brother-in-law is deforestation in such a way, she just throws a car key to vent her anger, nothing else. When Elliot was besieged and Pete was unable to resist, they just watched. Although their expressions were anxious and they recited Amitabha in their hearts, they still just watched. And just let Gavin load it away. Maybe people were alone at the time, but after all Gavin and the rounds were still employees of Jack's company. Didn’t they know that once everyone knew about the existence of dragons, the situation would be out of control, and any situation that might harm Elliot would arise? . It is more difficult to protect Elliot when the whole town is known to have dragons than to prevent Gavin from taking Elliot away.
There are actually a lot of logic bugs in the whole film. When they fell under the bridge, they fell together with the car and the steel bars of the bridge. Although the two of Grace had climbed out of the car, they were still in the car. At that time, I felt that when I was rescued, it would be more credible if Elliot grabbed them with his paws, and it would be a bit tugged if he was riding on his back. It turned out to be a bullshit.
In the end Pete returned to Grace's house. Grace's performance really didn't look like a child who had only known each other for more than two days. The feelings came too fast, like a tornado. And isn't it that the Department of Social Services will take Pete away, so I will stay at Grace's house. I don't know much about American law, but it doesn't seem to be so easy for a family with children to adopt an orphan.
The film seems to want to warm people's hearts with warmth, but there must be a certain logical basis for the generation of emotions, otherwise the warmth will become warm, not so touching.
View more about Pete's Dragon reviews
