As women, we are always educated to check our life style, pay attention to safety when we go out, and go home early after get off work. Why has no one ever taught men not to make jokes with colors, not to have erections, and not to go out at night to commit crimes?
Recommend an Indian movie "Cry Pink" . When a woman says "No", she doesn't want it, she refuses. Please don't be smart and obsessive.
At the end of the film, three girls were assaulted. After attending the concert, the three girls were invited to go to the resort to drink with three men, but the three men acted on them in an attempt to assault the girls.
The frightened female protagonist broke the head of one of the men with a wine bottle, triggering a lawsuit against patriarchal and feminist rights.
As the attacked men, their male authority was challenged and they were beaten by a woman. This made the three men very upset and tried to find the girls to retaliate.
Because "men want to show their status to women."
Let us see what these boys who claim to be highly educated, come from good families, and have social status do?
The first is to slander the three women who are not serious in their life styles , and threaten the landlord to let the girls move out on the phone.
The landlord and the girls got along for three years and knew the girls' behavior, so he refused the boys' threats.
Then, the boys arranged a car accident for the landlord and continued to threaten. If the girl is not allowed to move, it will not be as simple as a car accident next time.
Call the hostess to threaten her and prepare her to accept the humiliation.
Draw a circle, let us remember this man's face.
He thought that his friend was in the early stages of crusade against the "bad women of impropriety" as the moral commanding position. He was the most active person who jumped up and down in the early stage, threatening to kidnap and retaliate. But what is interesting is that he did not attend the party that day, and did not know the development of the matter. process.
One of the men pointed out that his behavior was too extreme, but was ridiculed for lack of masculinity and courage.
Is it like the male student who splashed the dirty water of the female classmate for nine years in the campus bullying report some time ago? The same is true of various P pictures spreading rumors to various social media to slander Ms. Wang, but the ridiculous thing is that the person involved, Ms. Wang, did not know the perpetrator Jiang. There was no intersection during school, and there was no suspicion. It was just because everyone said that Ms. Wang was improper. , So that the male group represented by Jiang has the courage to "walk the way for the sky", even if they are more promiscuous, they can do it with confidence.
Sure enough, all men in the world have a brain, thinking that by pouring dirty water on women's personal virtues, they can stand on the commanding heights of morality.
nausea.
So they have become more aggressive in framed the girls. P said that the girls were prostituting and sent the pictures to the girl's company.
Then kidnapped one of the girls, threatened her, even assaulted her , made her afraid, and made her pay the price of scratching their friend's face.
The girls had already experienced these unfortunate things, but the public opinion of their friends told them that they did something wrong .
Male friends ask them to apologize, and then forget about it and start life again.
The police first told them that they had to go to the place where the case occurred . They refused to accept it. Then they accused the girls that they shouldn’t go out with the boys. This was all they asked for . If they were brought to court, everyone would know what happened to them, and it would not be good for them. It is recommended that it be better to have a sleep and forget about it.
It was originally not their fault that caused the girls to admit their mistakes, and they should have taken the initiative to seek justice but let them settle their affairs. This is justice, this is what women should do, is this normal social order?
After doing all this, the boys still did not give up. The police station bought by the parents of the boys with good family background tried to suppress the charges of kidnapping the girl by the boys. Then the wicked filed a lawsuit and charged them with blackmail and intent to murder with the prostitute in prostitution . Take the heroine to court.
The really exciting part of the film is only now beginning.
The first person to testify was the waiter in the restaurant. The argument was that "they are not serious people". There are two evidences:
①Improper clothes;
②Go to a room with a man alone.
The answer given by the girl is:
① Clothes are normal clothes;
②Go out alone with another man because he wants to go to the bathroom, and the door of the next room with bathroom is locked, and the man has the key to the room.
The lawyer then argued geographically that she made a living from prostitution because she was from the northeastern region of Meghalaya ! So the hostess is prostitution.
Um? Regional black? So do Cantonese really eat Fujianese?
The hostess replied: As a girl from the northeast region, the frequency of being harassed on the street is indeed higher than that of ordinary Indian girls.
But because of being harassed, so will prostitution? What logic? !
In response to the aforementioned client’s inquiry, the girl’s lawyer concluded that:
Article 1 of "Girls Safety Handbook":
A girl should not go anywhere with a boy, not in a resort, nor can they use the bathroom alone. If the girl goes there alone, the boy will be tacitly granted the right to do something with the girl.
Then the boy with his scratched face appeared in court to testify. He was beaten. He received some hints and then refused the paid service offered by the girl. The girl became angry and emphasized that he was "raped" and was the victim.
The female lawyer questioned, what kind of hint did you prove that the hostess wanted to provide paid services?
The male lead replied because the female lead smiled at him and touched him when she spoke.
The female lawyer questioned, so the male lead felt that the reason the female lead suggested to him was just because he smiled at him and touched his skin?
So based on the statement of the male protagonist mentioned above, the female lawyer came to the second conclusion of the "Girl Safety Handbook":
When a girl talks to a boy, the girl cannot laugh and cannot have physical contact. This natural human behavior will make the boy think that the girl is behaving badly.
In order to prove that the girls’ morality is indeed problematic, the man found the girl’s neighbor, because the neighbor saw boys often go to their apartment.
The woman’s lawyer pointed out that the neighbor’s testimony was just a speculation. When she saw the man entering and leaving the girls’ apartment, she guessed that they were sleeping together, but she didn’t confirm it with her own eyes. But at least it proved one thing, that is , it is indeed a bit late for the girl to go home.
Then the female lawyer came to the third conclusion of the "Girl Safety Handbook":
Society is using time to determine the personality of girls. Girls walking alone on the road at night will slow down the car and roll down the windows, but not during the day.
The man’s lawyer continued to be aggressive and asked if his parents live nearby, but he still moved out?
The girl replied that she was an independent woman, and she moved out because she was afraid of disturbing her parents.
In the prostitution of lawyers, the girls moved out only to facilitate prostitution, because "Thousands of independent women live in their own homes, why are you the exception?"
It's probably like this.
Then continue to YY the girl was invited to dinner because she knew that the boy had money and background, because she took the initiative to pour the boy, this is the proof of deliberate plan!
The girl explained that she was invited because the other party was kindly invited, and that some of the boy’s college classmates who she knew thought they were safe, and the reason for pouring the wine was because the other party could not get it and helped him.
I was alone in the room with the male lead because her friends had all gone out first, so the male lead started to move her hands and feet, and after the warning was unsuccessful, he smashed him with a wine bottle.
From the above statement, the male protagonist has assumed that girls are not serious girls from the beginning , so he will act unscrupulously.
Because serious girls will not be invited to the resort to drink with them in the middle of the night!
But after the heroine said no, he continued to violate the heroine.
In response to the above statement, the female lawyer concluded the fourth conclusion of the "Girls Safety Handbook":
A girl can never drink with a boy, because the boy will think "If she is willing to drink with me, she will not mind sleeping with me".
So no matter which country you are in, the brain structure of men is really the same. For example, the famous Han Han in China also said the same thing:
"Eating alone with a man and watching a movie alone means that he has sex with this man and can do everything by holding hands."
? ? ?
I'm too lazy to analyze this sentence, knowing that there are special posts analyzing Han Han's remarks.
Back to the topic, the woman's lawyer continued to question the man's witness , "If a girl talks frankly and occasionally has physical contact, does it mean that she wants to sleep with you?"
This time the man denied it, but put forward a new argument, " Where did you meet it?"
So, the place you meet also determines a person's character?
Another point given by the man is : women from good families do not drink alcohol! His sisters and mothers do not drink alcohol.
But soon the woman’s lawyer took out a picture of the boy’s sister drinking.
Therefore, the female lawyer tried to conclude that in a good family, a woman who does not drink is decent, and a girl who goes to a party to drink is inappropriate. It is the easiest to start, so she can do whatever she wants.
And because girls wear certain skirts and drink alcohol, it can be judged that they are inherently misbehaving.
The irritated male protagonist finally expressed his thoughts: "If someone you don’t know agrees to go out for a drink, any sensible man will think she is willing, otherwise, why would he go out with you to open a room? In this case Next, everyone will try their luck, such a girl is called a prostitute!"
Now we advocate independence and want to be a free girl, but some feudal thoughts still shackle our lives. Girls are required to restrain their behavior. Once we violate the rules of behavior in the male concept, it will become us. The excuse for infringement is also their right to "punish" unscrupulously.
So girls shouldn’t live alone, boys can; girls can’t wear shorts and vests, boys can; girls should go home early from get off work and close doors and windows, boys can go home in the middle of the night; girls can’t smile when they talk, boys can; girls can’t Drinking, boys can... As long as we violate the above treaty, is we deserve it?
In the previous case of Lijiang being scratched, human blood steamed buns were eaten like this, right? Everyone's faces were crippled, but they were attacked by a group of morally self-proclaimed men "Why did you ask a man out for barbecue in the middle of the night?"
Haha.
It is clear that we are not the ones who made the mistake, we are the victims, why in turn have become "deserved to be victimized" and "deserved for the crime"?
Girls are educated to pay attention to safety, do not just hitchhiking, do not live in a hotel alone, do not walk alone at night, why no one educates the boys to take care of their lower body, not to have sexual obsession, and learn to respect women?
It is the male thoughts that should be saved, not the female self-defense skills.
We have the right to say no. No means no, no, no, I refuse. Whether it is a girlfriend, wife, acquaintance, or sex worker, if we say no, men must stop!
If you repeatedly refuse but still cannot stop the other party's infringement, then this is a crime.
Wrong is wrong. Don’t use any private morals to talk about things . Take 10,000 steps back. Even if there is a problem with private morals, it’s a personal problem. You can’t allow others to take care of things and do it under the pretext of "walking for the heavens." Acting illegally and committing crimes.
So, after being enlightened by the above-mentioned lawyer uncle, let me write the "Boys Education Manual":
①A boy should not go anywhere with a girl alone;
②A boy cannot communicate with any unfamiliar women on any social media;
③When boys and girls are talking, they can't talk or laugh, let alone any physical touch;
④Boys should never invite girls to drink alone;
⑤Boys should not go home late or stroll on the street at night;
⑥Boys should not wear shorts, vests and spray perfume;
⑦The body cannot have a physiological reaction at any time...
If a man violates the above, you see, he wants to commit a crime!
View more about Pink reviews
