Let me talk about my impressions, and I also recommended it by my friends. I have two views. The first one, from the end, it can be seen that the boss is collecting the protagonist, so how does he know that the protagonist will come to the villa tonight? Isn't the boss predictable? So here is very intriguing. Then we went back to the scene with the gang boss before the pig’s feet went to the villa. The pig’s feet were divided into 50% of the gems, but the boss disagreed, and the protagonist refused to let life or death, and despised: "I don’t think you can find anything more than me. "Appropriate" and the protagonist did not give up on the distribution of gem benefits later, and in the end the gang boss could only compromise. Note: The protagonist in the play wants 50%, but the boss refuses to let it. Under the scorn of the pig's feet being burned and the voice, the gang boss is relieved. Isn't this a compromise of the gang boss, and the protagonist also gave it to After he stepped down one step, it wouldn't be so stiff. Perhaps it was because this place was lost, a small seed of evil was buried in the boss's heart, and then slowly fermented. It made him want to retaliate, so he found the collector. Perhaps every performance artist has a quirk. The gang boss can’t let the collector do things for him with money, but he can promise an empty gloved white wolf like "This person is worth your collection", and the boss just wants one. It's just a gem. Therefore, the gang boss not only got gems, he sold a favor to a collector (of course, performance artists don't know whether to see favor), but he also killed a man who made me lose face. This also explains why the collector wants to collect the protagonist, and knows the reason why the protagonist will come to the villa tonight
Three birds with one stone! good!
Personally, I don’t agree with this point of view, because I can’t explain why the collector is chasing the little girl Hannah! So I have a second point of view!
It is mentioned many times in the play that the family of the villa owner will go out for a family dinner today, and it is already afternoon when the protagonist finishes repairing the door and leaving, so if the collector is with his teammates (there is another insecticide worker in the play) ) After returning to the company together, they were still staying in the villa. And in the play, a person who was collected said a sentence "He will kill people, but only those who he doesn't collect." We can see from this sentence that the purpose of collecting people is Hannah. He killed everyone, but I didn't kill Hannah alone. I didn't know if I didn't find it. I found it and put it in the box long ago!
The protagonist was caught in this game only by accident. After an hour-long battle of wits, the collector may slowly change his mind, thinking that the protagonist is more in line with his appetite, so he chose to collect the protagonist. ! So here can be explained, why the collector is chasing the little girl Hannah, but the latter chooses to collect the protagonist!
Well, my personal opinion is more inclined to the second one, because the first one is really far-fetched!
I have three last questions,
Are the same minors, do foreigners develop better? ! Hehehe!
In the last scene, the company logo that the collector tore off is whether it is a disguise he made to approach the villa or is it always his shelter. Why did the director give this scene?
Also, why should the ending end in tragedy? Can the protagonist escape in the end?
Okay, I have so many film reviews. Thank you, the little brother who has finished reading the film reviews I wrote. He has the agile skills and agile brain of the protagonist. I wish Miss Sister have the beautiful face like the protagonist's daughter, and the hot body like that who!
After all, this is my first film review, I hope you don’t fall for it! QAQ
View more about The Collector reviews
