note

Priscilla 2022-04-24 07:01:16

I've always believed that movies can make up for books, and that a second-rate book can make a first-rate movie. But this movie was a little disappointing. The book itself is not deep enough, and the political metaphor is greater than the artistic charm. When making a movie, the artistic charm is even more lacking. The scene is not like the future sci-fi time. It is less than the United States in the 1940s. The visual language is not mastered enough.

Lionel 2022-01-07 15:52:48

From the burning of witches and other dissidents in Christianity to the burning of Copernicus in the Inquisition, to 1984, including the Fahrenheit 451, all are the authorities’ fear of opinion, knowledge, freedom, and reason. Of course, things have two sides, but The monopoly of resources is a dangerous undercurrent, a warning that pushes the monopolist itself into the abyss. From the perspective of the movie itself, like Orwell’s novel, it follows the narrative of the fortress’s internal conquering, and the system first counters.