Who will pay for arrogance?

Aletha 2022-01-07 15:53:35

The duty of a soldier is to fight, and his professional driving force is to win. Stanley McChrystal, the general prototype played by Pete, is well versed in counter-insurgency fighting, and his strategy has also achieved phased success in the Iraqi battlefield. Pete’s core idea is to let the US military put aside its guard and establish a relationship between the military and civilians with Afghan civilians; the premise of this idea is that the Afghan people desire American democracy and need the protection of the US military. Unfortunately, this is only wishful thinking of the Americans. American generals and politicians naively believe that democracy and freedom are a universal political system, but not all nations have the soil to develop this system, and Afghanistan is no exception. The people of Afghanistan need the necessities of life: security; they don’t need luxury: democracy. As for security, although the intervention of the US military has curbed Al Qaeda and the Taliban’s threat to the West to a certain extent, it has destroyed the original political ecology between the villages and tribes, leaving the people living under the intimidation of the Taliban.

In fact, Pete knew in his heart that counter-insurgency combat was a difficult battle to win. The key to victory lies in gaining popular support, and the foundation of popular support lies in the pursuit of democracy and security by the Afghan people. It is only through the communication between Pitt and the Afghan advisers and the people. The foundation of this assumption is not strong and uncommon in Afghanistan.

Faced with such a huge difficulty, Pete's arrogance overwhelmed rational thinking. He is a professional soldier, and his professional glory lies in winning. The need to implement combat thinking requires additional sources of troops, not only the US military, but also allies. But, for such unrealistic strategic goals, should rational allies bear the cost without return? Should all stakeholders pay for one's ambitions?

View more about War Machine reviews

Extended Reading
  • Kaleigh 2022-01-07 15:53:35

    Almost every line in the first half is ironic and absurd, as if Dr. Strange Ai, and afterwards it becomes serious and can't laugh. Pete’s prototype is a scholarly ascetic general. His book "Team of Teams" is a textbook for Huawei’s 170,000 employees. His special forces captured Saddam alive and killed Zarqawi. He implemented a strategy of close to the people in Afghanistan. Conventional warfare relies on military uniforms to identify enemies, killing one and one less. And in Afghanistan, terrorists strayed among the people and killed ten relatives and stood up to fight you desperately. Therefore, the general would present awards to soldiers who did not shoot. How many people have you persuaded, how many people have not been killed, and how many houses have not been destroyed." But how can an intruder win the hearts of the people? He revealed to "Rolling Stone" the misfortune and would not be a scapegoat for losing the war.

  • Rosetta 2022-03-24 09:02:50

    After reading it for two days, I forgot to search for the name for a long time...

War Machine quotes

  • President Karzai: Your predecessor, General Whelan! I liked him! I'm not entirely certain he liked *me*; he didn't visit very often. Why was he dismissed? It seems- uhh, one minute he was here- uh, next minute, not here.

    Gen. Glen McMahon: Ah. Well, Mr. President, I think our government simply felt it was time our effort took a new direction.

    President Karzai: And uh, what is this new direction?

    Gen. Glen McMahon: Ah! It's most important to me that we *build* Afghanistan. Together, we build Afghanistan into a free and prosperous nation, free from fear and conflict.

    President Karzai: I see.

    Gen. Glen McMahon: Yeah.

    President Karzai: I see. Sounds a lot like the *old* direction.

  • Gen. Glen McMahon: God damn it, Pete. Why are you fat?