The heroine is actually a risk assessor and a risk solver. Faced with various uncertain factors, she has to investigate one by one and report to the upper level at the same time. When the non-overload risk comes down, the psychologist will assess the risk and decide the risk execution plan at the same time. The role of the heroine is to solve the part that exceeds the program overload when the situation exceeds the risk assessment resolution process. The female protagonist’s treatment method is standardized. In this action, it is reflected in the action that if the behavior of the parties in the institution she assesses exceeds the range that she can predict, or if there is an overload risk, then it will be eliminated. The female protagonist’s approach can be seen from the elimination of Anmi and the chef, that they are eliminated when the two individuals show emotional and unpredictable behavior, rather than indiscriminate elimination when the situation escalates. There is a clear difference between the heroine's treatment method and Morgan's. Morgan's choice is emotional and self-interested, and this kind of self-interest is the most intolerable for project investors. This is why, psychologists have to constantly ask what action Morgan would choose to deal with the damage to his own interests. The criteria for project investors are explained at the end of the film, which is to produce suitable tools, and at the same time imply the search for a new group to replace the human group. In other words, in the social elite, human beings are only the main tools used now, and finding substitutes is just like iron tools replacing stone tools in accordance with the law of development. On this basis, it can be extended that the development of modern science and technology is not to meet the needs of human beings, but to replace human beings in society step by step. Think about modernization, informatization, and automation, all of which are replacing the status of human labor.
View more about
Morgan reviews