The film is adapted to real themes, and the plot is basically quite satisfactory. There are no bright spots. If you insist on saying "Radcliffe's acting", you can take a look. Compared with that, what is the slot? Well, there can be. It feels more interesting than the highlights, especially Radcliffe and other actors' "the cutest height difference".
Height is not a distance, acting is the key
Video overview
about "a young FBI agent Nate depth neo-Nazi organization undercover (white supremacy), find out who conspired to make a dirty bomb," the story
into the movie, Aspect really small, all I don't know how to write a film review. I can only talk about it with Radcliffe.
Radcliffe, in my opinion, has always been difficult to get rid of the shadow of Harry Potter. He has been looking for opportunities to integrate into Hollywood and tried various themes. From horror, fantasy, comedy to this crime documentary, I worked hard (in order to adapt to American movies, even abandoned the British accent and began to speak American), the growth in acting skills is obvious to all, from "Swiss Army Knife Man" to "Now You See Me 2", including this one, with different roles, different states, and the same excellent acting skills, Harry Potter is really mature. Nevertheless, the audience's first impression of the appearance of Radcliffe before the big screen was "Harry Potter". The sense of substitution was too strong and the transition was not easy.
Second, the conflicts of the characters in the film (I don't understand, all people related to Nate have positive or non-positive conflicts with him, cliché, and boring) and the intense storyline makes the audience a little bit interesting in the film.
At the end, there are no more things to watch, comment on the slot, dizzy, or start with "Harry Potter", Radcliffe is lying innocently with the gun, personally expressing very speechless.
I. The protagonist Nate
has two parts for Radcliffe's role of Nate. (The PS director is too weak, the screenwriter is too poor, the actors are too hard, the plot is too bloody, and the audience is speechless)
1.
The role of Nate as an FBI agent is logically unclear. For example, as a novice, how can he easily gain the trust of his boss to perform undercover operations? Obviously, I feel that the screenwriter did not carefully consider these points. For the description of the FBI, the subjective consciousness exceeds the objective facts.
2. Nate entering the enemy has
more external forms than internal deductions. Although the actors themselves have achieved the ultimate. Bald heads, gangster costumes, tattoos, all you can do, but unfortunately these are just external things, and the inner psychological description is lackluster.
Furthermore, the plot of the infiltration is too understatement.
As an FBI agent, can you use your real name to get into the separatist organization? It’s incredible that
as a random personal background (a warrior who has experienced Iraq), there is no document to support it. The enemy believes it inexplicably, why not do a comprehensive review?
As a part of the organization, it is illogical to repeatedly prevent the extreme behavior of the accomplices. Although it has been questioned, it still ends up in the end? what for? I don't understand, the story is missing too much, which makes people doubt the director's narrative analysis ability.
II. I
don’t know why the story rhythm is controlled. The director spent a lot of time and plot to describe the personal conflict (Nate and Roy), but ignored the detailed explanation of how Nate successfully sneaked into the enemy organization. This is really puzzling, normal. The cohesion of the content of the story is definitely more detailed than the description of the character conflict. No director is willing to sacrifice the coherence of the story in exchange for the shaping of a certain character. This is unscientific and not worthwhile. It destroys the original structure of the story and reduces the film’s feasibility. Look at sex.
III. The ending of the film is
hurried, disorderly, and puzzled. Personally did not understand this ending. Gerry's actions were blocked by Nate and stopped abruptly. There was no clue, no follow-up, and it was over.
The final picture and final speech of the film stay at the level of "ideological education", which is too dogmatic and uninteresting.
Written at the end, the concepts and viewpoints of the film belong to the mainstream of today. Unfortunately, the poor performance of the director and screenwriter makes the original brilliant plot lack the original light, leaving only some superficial content that has been forgotten. It's a pity that "Harry Potter" played hard.
Recommended crowd: "Harry Potter" fans
detailed film reviews + stills can see "Floyd and Helen's Journey Collection", thank you
View more about Imperium reviews
