Hitler's words at the beginning of the movie, at first glance, I thought it was an in-depth movie about human nature or democracy, race, etc., and the oxygen cylinders were ready, so I was afraid of large sections. Large sections of dialogue, arguments and proper nouns. One-third of the time, it turned out to be undercover. It seemed that the plot was tight and the plot was ups and downs, so I went to prepare popcorn, and it turned out.
Harry, no one can save him. Regardless of his acting skills, I have read an article long ago about his desire to get rid of Harry's shadow and broaden his own acting. He has taken many different types of movies and a large-scale stage play. But in my mind, he doesn't have Harry's shadow at all. Harry Potter is the Daniel of the first film in my heart, and the image that Daniel created later was actually him. In each of his roles, there is always an inherent tension in speaking. I think he is very suitable for the role of tension. Whether it is killing Ru Ai or this absolute rule. If you have seen the people interviewed by him, you should feel it too. This is his own characteristic. A good actor is to create a role, not to transform each role into himself. To be honest, I am really not used to watching his characters, and I always feel like I have to swallow half a word in my speech (except for the Swiss Army knife man, after all, there are not many half-dead people). In addition, he did not receive some movies with good scripts, and it is estimated that his acting skills are indeed not very confirmed.
The focus of this movie is really hard to find. First of all, the meaning of the name is not clearly explained in the film. Second, the strange Hitler's sentence appears at the beginning. If he wants to say it is a clue character in the film If one of the radio speakers incited the jihad of ethnic cleansing, the portrayal of this clue character would be very weak. Because in a later argument, the main idea was that the agents wanted to do something after experiencing many unsettled cases, so instead they began to hope that there was a big movement, such as a terrorist attack or an explosion. This kind of mood can be understood, but from this direction, will this kind of psychology be too inconsistent? It was discussed that several organizations that claimed to be Aryan people to clean up their doors in the name of worshipping Zoroastrianism were also dressed up, and there were no more explanations in pictures of some gatherings. In short, there is really nothing left to say.
Hitler's behavior can be regarded as an anti-human behavior. I don't know why the crowd who wanted to restore this kind of jihad in the movie did not receive a strong counterattack when they marched. Opposing the crowd in twos and threes, although there were scenes of bloodshed at the end, if someone chanted slogans such as White Power in DC, I believe it would not be possible to deal with such a scene, lacking a lot of shock that should be, no The shock of storytelling is the shock of these concepts themselves, such as re-proclaiming the Nazi spirit and the destruction of Western civilization by democracy. These big concepts can originally reflect very profound and complex history, philosophy, logic, and human rights. Etc., whenever these concepts are spoken out, they will stimulate the audience themselves. However, neither the film editors and directors have caught this point, and the film also insisted on filming such organizations into cults that burned the cross. The whole movie feels like a small-cost production, and then I want to put some money to use it, and then I use these big frames to impatiently tell a sluggish story that is not very exciting. Including the explanation of the protagonist Nate to the people who doubted him, he can only believe it when he is drunk. At the end, I made some emotional statements, and even wanted to say a few philosophical words. I also wronged Daniel and blessed the successful transformation in my heart.
View more about Imperium reviews
