The background of this story makes people feel that the logic is unreasonable, so the heavy performance in it is only embarrassing...If the knights have to avenge, they should kill the emperor together. After all, what the treacherous minister wants to do is approved by the emperor. Such recklessness made enough effort to take up a large part of the movie but avenged half of it. It is ridiculous to look at it not tragic.
What makes people feel more awkward is the inconsistent world outlook. In the beginning, the death of the duke embodies the absolute authority of the imperial power, the absolute power of the regent, and the duke and his subordinates did not even stand up to resist. However, after the acting, this group of people despised authority so much, assassinating the regent was fearless, and the king showed a symbolic attitude. In the end, the protagonist didn't know why he didn't die. If they play like this before, the protagonist and the others should start to change their dynasties.
That’s why it’s said that the background makes people feel unreasonable. If you change to a family family, the master is murdered by another family family, the property is annexed, and the subsequent revenge, step by step management is more reasonable and reasonable, and the villain's protagonist will be more frightened for fear of retaliation. reality.
Now this villain, corruption and bribery have gone, and the power is in control, the king trusts him so much, and people who hate him are like crucian carp who cross the river. Such a person can sit in this position without being cruel and courageous? But just because the protagonist's eyes were threatening, he became utterly nagging all day long, and became a heart disease. This psychological quality is also too bad.
So in general, this is just for the knight's gimmick. If you have to think of a story about four different things, it will make people feel very funny without any tragic emotions.
View more about Last Knights reviews
