Broke back? It's hard to say if you follow the spiritual love theory of Grandpa Plato. But as a male audience with a very vulgar sexual orientation, I actually didn't really see it. In Conan Doyle’s original book, Watson worships Holmes infinitely. I haven’t read Wigram’s fan comics. Gai obviously has a doubling in the movie again, but Jude’s affection for Downey is also fierce. There is no original work beyond Jazz, right?
As far as the movie works are concerned, the rotten girls are simply demons. They yelled them once and killed them when they met the gods, regardless of the taste of your original work. Of course, it is the right of every viewer to interpret the movie—the natural right of their talents, and it is also their freedom for the corrupt girls to do so. Moreover, for publishers, the rotten girls are definitely a group of cute little devils. With their word of mouth, the box office is not bad. In this film, Jude and Downey’s two-person turn to side dishes, when the next Brad Pitt version of Professor Moriarty comes out, it will really be a 3P feast.
To paraphrase Mr. Lu Xun's comment on Luo Guanzhong, Conan Doyle is "so wise and close to monsters like Sherlock Holmes." The detective is actually a rationalist devil. He knows astronomy and geography. He does math problems in his spare time to solve the boredom. He spends his time in the British Library and grinds out the footprints under the seat. In addition, he is also a superb stylist who is proficient in various micro-integration techniques, plus Love backpacking. Look at this quality. Is there a case he can't solve? Of course, when the original work is later, Holmes's psychological motives are also a bit exaggerated. His idea of investigating cases is advanced in the original style, but out of it.
Sherlock Holmes was born at the time when Britain’s second industrial revolution was like fire and tea. The spark of rationalism, planted by the Renaissance and activated by the Enlightenment, burned into a prairie fire. This is an era where reason is long live and man is determined to conquer the sky. . In Max Weber's words, the world has long since been disenchanted. Under the clever plan of Holmes, the god of rationality, the pony tails are all revealed. Guy Ritchie played a trick. Big Boss Black was initially portrayed as a supernatural dark wizard. When I saw the film halfway through, I really thought that Conan Doyle had encountered J.K. Rowling this time, and my heart was dark. Think: darling, Guy Ritchie is also a liberal arts student, and he is so familiar with the irrational thoughts of the twentieth century? Actually take the empire's rationalist spokesperson to sacrifice the flag?
In the end, the baggage was overturned. The Blake, the bad stage magician, relied on Liu Qian's efforts to eat the British Parliament, and intended to build a totalitarian society before Mussolini and Stalin. Of course, he would fly eggs. But this also unintentionally outlines the comic image of the dictators. How can a totalitarian society be established? Doesn't it depend on the promise of the heaven on earth and the creation of ideological myths? And the creation of this ideological myth is bound to be implemented in the creation of the personal image of the dictator*, the original monarchy and gods have been transformed into the French Revolution-style "people" title. Robespierre ended up playing with fire and set himself on fire, and Blake could not escape this life. Of course, Blake in the movie mainly relied on trust and biological and chemical experiments, plus clever media hype. How could this be concealed from Downey's version of Sherlock Holmes? ?
Thanks to Edmund Burke’s family members, Guy Ritchie always has a bit of potential for conservatism in making movies. The tradition of freedom must be preserved. Holmes is too unfettered to fight murderers. It’s a shameless fight to die "Asshole", this time fighting against totalitarian ambitions, it's a lot of fun. But then again, conservatism actually doubts people’s rationality. To use Holmes’ rationality to debunk Blake’s mythology, we have to rely on Sherlock Holmes’s Washington-like personal sentiments. It is estimated that the one printed is not the queen.
My English listening is not that good, and I can’t tell whether Donnie speaks London accent or Tangshan accent. The YY is rot. I’m also rot when I break on rationalism and conservatism. When I watch a movie, I’ll look for everyone. Fun.
Movie reviews, to put it bluntly, it's just a word of "corrupt".
Not being corrupt is not enough for civilians to be angry, of course.
*It is worth noting that this god-making movement usually extends to the theoretical mentors of dictators.
(Southern Net Special)
View more about Sherlock Holmes reviews
