Worldview:
1. In a single causal world, the future can be changed, and the past will not change because of the present.
2. The photo is only a prediction of the current world (it can be considered as another parallel world), not fatalistic. But Sanzhujiao and (Professor) both think so. (There is controversy here. I think that the screenwriter wants to set the world view to be the same as reality. Fatalism cannot be confirmed, but I think this is conducive to understanding the plot.)
3. The first stage of the professor’s experiment was set a day earlier at 8:00 and 20:00. Each time, the cycle is 24h; the second stage has only one photo in the next 2 weeks, and the cycle is two weeks. An experimental photo is attached ("If you can see this, this is tomorrow")
4. Only the female protagonist saw the photos taken during the day, but she watched them with the 20:00 photo at night, so she was not suspected ( Evidence: There is a dialogue at the end of the film).
If you don’t agree with my world view, please read the detailed explanation. If you want to watch, please at least watch the film carefully (pay attention to details)
Q&A:
1. Q: Why can I shoot today’s newspaper with winning information (let's call it the note)? Always get bonuses?
A: Since the photos are based on current predictions, if you have the habit of taking future photos every day (the law of inertia) in your current consciousness, then this habit will remain in the future and you will also take photos in the future. Then send it back through this future camera, Then you can always win the lottery.
2. Q: What does it mean that the world view is based on the prediction?
A: For example, you decided to eat kfc at 8:00 24 hours ago, and take pictures with the future camera at this time, it will show that you are eating kfc. Then you believe it, you will die (disappear) if you don't eat it, and then you really eat it.
3. Q: Why did the camera take another photo at the end of the credits?
A: The set period of the second phase experiment of the professor should be 2 weeks. The photo taken by the professor at the end of the credits happened to be taken at this time two weeks ago.
3. Q: Does the professor believe in fate? Did he die because of fate?
A: There are two evidences. The first is a photo: "If you can see this, this is tomorrow." Boldly guess that this photo is probably just a thought experiment. It was just a thought at the time, and as a result, future photos came, and then I didn’t do it the next day and didn’t post anything (maybe it was just an experiment of minor changes). The second is a note: If you believe in God, tell God that you don’t want to poke any holes. After seeing two weeks of dead people and pictures with green spirographs, he felt that something was going to happen to them. So decided to destroy (guess), and then died unexpectedly. He must be unsure of fatalism, just want to give it a try. Nor can it be determined that it is fateful death, only that it is death.
There are basically no bugs in this film under the framework of the world view. If you have any, please feel free to submit a
summary: 1. The
three pig's feet think that the photos are fatalistic, and you will die if you don't follow the photos. In fact, the photos are all based on the formula prediction of the actual situation (initial conditions) (the pig's feet think it is correct (the initial conditions are locked), so all the photos become correct (the result of the lock)). There are a lot of evidences in the film to show this. In fact, there are no future photos, just watching the plot will develop according to the timeline of the script. The photo only serves as a fuse and positive feedback, not in the future.
2. The female protagonist appears to be the male protagonist's girlfriend, but actually wants to use this future camera (secretly looking at the daytime photos) to choose between the two, which is a bitch.
The following is a table of all the photos, exactly 2 weeks (the professor predicts the time for the second stage):
day1
8:00 Turn over the coat rack and hide the photos
at 8 o’clock during the day 20:00 Hangers fall
day2
8:00 N\A
20:00 Party
day3-7
8:00 N\A
20:00 Three people stand in a row, there is a dog racing photo at the bottom left
day8
8:00 Kiss the man 2 for too long (sceptical face)
20:00 The heroine and the man 2 kiss
day9
8:00 Go to the car with the hero , (laugh)
20:00 The man 2 confronts the boss
day10
8:00 This is naked Paint for the male protagonist (different from the actual painting)
20:00 The male
protagonist paints for the female protagonist day11
8:00 Buy a model book (I chose you again, to cater to the male protagonist's preferences)
20:00 Sit in a row, more Dog gambling photos, no painting,
day12
8:00 Don’t forgive the male lead
20:00, still in a row, more dog gambling photos + skeleton painting
day13
8:00 N\A
20:00 Male 2 is proud, the table is full of money , No painting
day14
8:00 secretly exchange photos, kill the male 2 savior (male 2 and female
protagonist love love) 1?:?? [day0] to seal the scene (photo taken by the professor two weeks ago in the second stage)
1? :?? N\A (At the end of the film, you can see the unseen picture)
20:00 to seal the scene (it has only two more seals than the second-stage photo of the professor)
*The green ribbon in the bottle looks like DNA, it looks like there is A
detailed analysis of the implied timeline:
The title has made it clear that the relationship between the three pigs' feet is very clear. The male protagonist is an honest and talented but very useless painter. He does the cleaning job and doesn't care much about his girlfriend. Male 2 is a gambler addict. He always stares at the female lead, but the male lead doesn't care. The female protagonist is obviously the male lead's girlfriend, but has a leg with the male 2. Male 2 also enjoys this sneaky relationship. After getting the camera of the future, the purpose of the three is to paint inspiration, money, and boyfriend's choice.
Day1
is professor had just died the day yesterday, women first found myself next camera, so there are photo opportunities hidden during the day 8:00, the three professors based on diaries and professors say they want to try (not illustrated) hung up, inference is fatalism.
This day, the heroine was sitting in front of the window and writing something (with camera), the content was the first photo of the heroine at 8 o'clock.
Party on Day2
, verify the photos, if you believe it, you will have it (if you don’t believe it, you won’t), strengthen this positive feedback.
Day3-7
won a lot of money.
On Day8,
in the laboratory, the heroine wore a beautiful red dress and caused the male 2 to stare, causing the two to rekindle. When the hero was serious about painting, he kissed (secretly).
When the hostess receives a note that the kiss is too long, she has to see if the host has let herself take such a long time in front of him. As a result, I forget myself so seriously when I paint (spiral clock). Negative points against the male lead.
Day9
Male 2 secretly told the boss to use half of the money to bet one, and the boss asked "Are you sure". Aroused the boss's suspicion, to find out. The photo only caused the boss to be harassed from behind. (He actually put a baseball bat next to him, making himself dead).
The hostess received instructions to go to the car and went to the car with the host. The host finally admitted that he was jealous. Make a positive score and kiss.
Day10
care of the household in order to allow them "to rebuild good," know the male nude painting love painting, so that the male nude painting her portrait painted. (Note: the future photos are different from the actual ones), the male protagonist is showing love to the female protagonist at this time, and the female protagonist is playing a positive score.
The boss found the camera in the future and wanted to use it to make money. Male 2 hides weapons everywhere (triggering the golf clubs at the end of the credits).
On Day11,
under the threat of the boss, the photos showed more pictures of the winning result note, and the result was really much more. (There are no photos of the protagonists here).
In order to further improve the relationship with the male protagonist and cater to the male protagonist, the female protagonist smiled when he saw the book of nude models. Continue to divide.
Day12
Male 2 is very mechanical and courageous to get the boss and his subordinates, but the male protagonist only knows to call the police. The female protagonist thinks "Hey, a coward is a coward" and directly scores 0 points. Under the care of the male protagonist, he lost his temper inexplicably and let him go. (It is very noteworthy here, because even if there is no note, I believe that the heroine will send an anonymous fire to the hero, which further characterizes the non-fatalism) The heroine abandons the hero and will not let him sleep together.
Day13
(Last night: The professor’s appointment came, and I got the photo 2 weeks later, which is tomorrow’s photo. The scene was blocked.) Male 2 killed her directly, and the female protagonist said that seeing the male 2 was a lunatic murderer. Directly low score. You might be abused if you stay with him.
Day14
(Last night: The heroine designed a photo-changing scheme, and the two had a dispute to test who they chose). She said, "He wouldn't point a gun at me, right", and was beaten in the face on the spot. Saved the male lead, killed the male 2. When the female protagonist was leaving the day note, she was discovered by the male protagonist. The male protagonist destroyed the machine and was killed. I thought that leaving a note could change the present, but I left "Don't be caught at the window" in front of the window and was caught by the police. (Ironic)
Ending: The
female protagonist is also enough. There is no evidence (shown in the film) that changing the note can change the current world. You kill the last boyfriend rashly. This is your death. Even if it changes, it will only change the timeline of an earlier day (parallel world). Besides, didn't you see that the final photo was going to be blocked on the same day? Don't you believe in fatalism? Is change useful?
In fact, think about it, the heroine didn't kill the hero, the hero destroyed the machine, and the two took the money and went away. Has the final photo changed? The results are all self-made, don't blame your own destiny for this.
The whole play is over.
The setting of the film is novel, and the plot is not bad. It is bright and dark. Pursue positive energy. It feels a bit inferior to "Relevance", but it is also an upper-level work. The details are hidden, but too much noise is a bit verbose. Insufficient depth, endurance: look at it carefully, pick it up again.
I also like watching this kind of film very much, welcome to read my other film reviews.
Reprint must indicate the source
View more about Time Lapse reviews
