This film is in line with the point of view of many technological disaster films, that is, it is believed that humans cannot play the role of God to do extraordinary things such as resurrecting the dead, otherwise it will not end well. Since there is no new idea in the conception, it has no choice but to tell the story in context. The film did not disclose who was the mole inside the laboratory. I guess it was either the heroine or the first dog to be resurrected. If it is a female protagonist, it can only be said that the short circuit including the back is a game she has planned long ago, the purpose is to make the male protagonist desperately resurrect himself and do more evil and unspeakable things. . . If it's a dog, it can be explained that this experiment is too evil. After the dog is resurrected, he opens his mind, and then can't stand it anymore. Report it to the superior. The brain neurons of the resurrected creature will establish new connections and gain superpowers, similar to the author's love "Lucy" last year. Of course, Lucy is a good girl and is not dead.
For some reason, after watching the young heroine's feat, I thought of the girl who took the baby out of the elevator and threw it downstairs in Sichuan last year. This kind of extremely cruel anti-social behavior of bear children does exist, and it is difficult to explain with educational psychology. It is estimated to be embedded in genetic genes, and it requires multiple genes to be dominant at the same time to be activated, so the probability of occurrence is extremely small. . When the behavior of the bear child does not attract people's attention, and grows up to be very promising, mastering the power of science and technology, it is very dangerous! I wonder what the little girl was doing last year? On the other hand, in the film many times it is explained that the heroine is very resentful for the hero's delay in marrying her, and the dialogue before killing the black male partner even shows that she lacks love. So if the hero had married her earlier, the tragedy might not have happened.
Confusing and even contradictory endings seem to be more and more common in American films. At the end, the soy sauce female partner finally defeated the heroine, but was subsequently killed by the heroine. In the last shot, the heroine is using the same method to resurrect the hero. Could it be that the so-called opening of the door by the female partner only awakened the conscience in the female lead? And the female protagonist’s understanding of conscience is to think of the male protagonist’s love and benefits for her again, knowing that the male protagonist wants to count her out of love, so the male protagonist also resurrected the same way and continued to love her? If this is the case, after the heroine is resurrected, the heroine may also pull up the heroine and the two cannon fodder men. However, the first male partner to die should be the meaty state after the bloodletting and deacidification, and the resurrection may be a bit difficult.
View more about The Lazarus Effect reviews
