Recently, I watched movies from the perspective of how the story tells. From this perspective, one million golden arms can still be seen, but due to the limitations of the subject matter, the most important pen and ink is the director's too much work. NO ZUO NO DIE, it is also necessary not to be a box office poison.
I personally understand that there are several aspects to telling a good story in a movie. 1. The storyline itself is fascinating. For example, the conflict in the drama is unexpected and reasonable. Most movies of this type give the audience a feeling of a fresher, more interesting and exciting life experience. 2. The method of storytelling is very unique and novel, allowing a story that may be very common to be told in different levels (order), angles (storytellers), images (camera shooting techniques and background music sound effects), interpretation (lines) , Quentin, who is well-known by the audience, is of this kind. The ones that fail are the various blockbusters of famous Chinese directors. 3. There are some stories that are relatively simple and the method of storytelling is not novel, but the in-depth exploration and display of the emotional and emotional details of the characters have moved and resonated the audience, such as many recent Middle Eastern movies, small shoes, Vajada, etc., simply describe this type of film as art comes from life above life.
From the above three perspectives that I have summed up, the Million Golden Arms is not an outstanding movie. The first two perspectives are quite satisfactory, and the third perspective ends. Of course, as mentioned above, it is a story that fits this theme.
Highlights in the movie:
1. A retired coach who has been nap, he knows how fast the ball is thrown by listening. Behind to help the actor bridge the match.
2. The conversation between the Indian men who assisted the male protagonist in India before they set off to the United States, for the two Indian children, is a life-changing opportunity, and the male protagonist’s response to business to business that the male protagonist is accustomed to has benefited everyone. The Indians say again that it is different for them. The reason why this touches me is also because of my own growth experience. If it is not for growing up in a closed environment where resources are limited and there is only one opportunity, it is impossible to understand the joy, excitement, and excitement when a gap is opened in the sky. I am also worried about the lost dual psychology, which is also the basis for the development of the entire story's emotional line.
3. Indian boys are curious about women and the relationship between men and women. The lovely dialogues, although not particularly brilliant, on many issues, human beings are the same, regardless of race, region, rich or poor, they have some effect on eliminating the audience's racial prejudice.
4. In the end, the protagonist said to the two children, you go this time, you want to enjoy, have fun. An Indian boy posed his initial stand on one foot in the throw, which is also a detailed performance of having fun. To a certain extent, it makes me feel that in life/life, no matter what kind of situation, what kind of character is completed, in the final analysis, I must make myself as happy as possible.
＊I am a non-professional film critic. All the above content is based on my understanding of the film during the viewing process. If you have different opinions, please comment and instruct. I will report all offensive, abusive and insubstantial comments.
View more about Million Dollar Arm reviews
