Compared with the religious/philosophical/psychological background of some people who pay more attention to the story, I think it is more helpful to people today in the discussion about the relationship between people. After all, the narrative background is a big bowl used to structure the story. Because of the different aesthetics and preferences, everyone can say two sentences without pain. It doesn't matter if it is reasonable or unreasonable. The food in the bowl is the part that the author devotes more to. The people who taste it know how warm and cold they are, can feel the sweetness of the tongue, and the pain is also painful in their heart. (Why I can’t use a metaphor without eating!!!) Being understood is not a prerequisite for understanding others. How to face others and how to face oneself are often not two things. Hurting others and hurting yourself is often possible. At the same time. I think I still love this world where everyone has their own "ATField", although everyone has places in their hearts that others can't reach, and no one can see someone's complete heart. The way to make up for this shortcoming may not be to reduce each other's "ATField" deliberately, but to make up for it with trust and love.
Self, others, and the entire world are full of imperfections and imperfections. Others make up this world, but they see it through their own eyes. The process of accepting the world has actually become a process of accepting oneself.
When I was a teenager, I didn't get on the EVA, didn't study hard, didn't watch cartoons, and didn't do much except puppy love. Now, I am not worried that there are too many things to do before I get old. What I am worried about is the mistakes I made when I was young until I was too old to notice.
View more about Neon Genesis Evangelion: The End of Evangelion reviews