But if these filmmakers "created" this story, it is really unfair to Mark Zuckerberg and his social network-he and all Facebook-related talents are the ones who created this story, you, me, and others who have Facebook The user also participated in a small hand.
Then brought this story into the literature, and then into the video hall is Ben Mezrich, the author of "The Accidental Millionaire-A Story About Sex, Money, Genius and Betrayal". This documentary literature is already his second The story of being bought by Hollywood, the last step is the story of MIT students defeating the Las Vegas casino, "21" starring Kevin Shipaixi.
The reason for Ben's writing this time was actually Eduardo Saverin, one of the company's founders approached him to complain. In the smoke of many lawsuits, Ben, as a documentary writer, tried countless times to contact Mark Zuckerberg in order to verify the authenticity and fairness, but was repeatedly rejected. Ben had to curve to save the country and contact many other parties to understand the truth. Fortunately, , When the author was investigating this book, none of the Facebook’s out-of-court settlements were reached. Once reached, the confidentiality agreement was signed and no one could explain the truth to the author.
Because of this, when the book was released to the public in 2009, it rose to fourth in New York’s new book list and first in Boston, but Mark and Facebook publicly resisted, saying that this is a fictitious "fiction", saying that he would never read it. .
This story speaks from the business potential: at
the top level, there are 500 million people in the world-all Facebook users can contact this story.
On the next level, this is the entrepreneurial story of the world's youngest billionaire (billionaire).
Going further, this is about how people should treat friends and people who trust you.
At the deepest level, this is about how a person treats himself.
So when this book came out, the first-line producers should have full confidence in the value of this story. As early as 2008, Hollywood bought the option as soon as the book was delivered to the publishing house. It has been hidden by the producer Scott Rudin.
Scott Rudin may be the most reliable and story-oriented producer in Hollywood. What he does, Regardless of the film type, there is no kitsch, and there are few failures. From "Zulander" and "South Park" to "Road to Revolution" and "Blood Black Gold", there is entertainment and depth. Those who love movies, believe in Rudin.
Details:
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0748784/
Scott Rudin to hold in June 2009 decided to join David Fincher, the industry's only open messages put out to be his screenwriter Aaron Sorkin.
Where all the creative one to that , A genius without "social ability" will have no women, no clubs, and no bad habits to disturb, thus creating a great "social network". This contradiction is the core story of the film.
This person is extremely high since the Ming and Qing Dynasties, sensitive, very competitive, and obsessed with goals to the point of ignoring the existence of everyone. If this is a Chilean and insightful person, he may become a local hegemon, but Mark is a talented programmer-this combination upset Harvard and American universities within a year (2003-2004). All "involved" personnel were within this year, and the contradictions tended to intensify.
The story is better than the characterization, concise and powerful, hate speech, and heavy taste. With so many parallel stories,
I have to say that my favorite play is that the two twins go to Larry Summers to recite the school motto. Who is this former principal of Harvard? He became the Secretary of the Treasury of Bush in 2005, and the biggest economic crisis in human history was sung by him and Greenspan.
The scene gave him a middle finger without any cover.
However, neither the original film nor the film described Mark as a thief, a liar-no one can deny his genius, and his vision and judgment as a business leader are also admirable.
But the core thing of the film, this part about how people should live, left a long series of ellipsis.
Social networks can bring you things you didn’t touch before, but they can’t change people’s behavior and attitudes, especially attitudes towards people: People who like to say bad things at ordinary times will only become more vigorous and unobstructed on the Internet. An arrogant person will never respect other people's thoughts and speeches.
There is nothing more than a new way for 500 million people to spend their time in contact with new things in the world.
View more about The Social Network reviews
