To pick something wrong, here are the following: As for the
audience, we are sitting in the middle of the room. The location is very good. Near the movie for an hour, there is a woman on the right hand side in front of us who answers the phone loudly. In those short ten minutes, I really wanted to throw the New Orleans chicken drumstick in my hand, but I could bear it considering the image of my boss in the research group and the problem of dinner.
In terms of text and sound. Very current, very suitable for the situation, such as "not bad money", "house girl", "adult", "tolls are collected", the nouns are translated like watching martial arts novels, watching movies at the moment, it makes people feel a sense of identity , I think it’s funny; but in retrospect, the language habits of all parties are gathered. It is a hodgepodge of Chinese, Taiwanese, and Hong Kong people. There is no character, and it is tasteless. The commercialization is too strong, and it becomes a memory trash.
The character image is too bright and too Chinese. The most obvious is the octopus. In the English version, he is a little figure who thinks he is very powerful and evil, and he thinks he is cute. Many small eyeballs and tentacles can reflect his cuteness as a child; but in the Chinese dubbing, I found a gloomy voice and accent that was very similar to that of the Lord Yan, and the linguistic playfulness in English was also removed. With the original action, it looked strange, like an eunuch, and uncomfortable. Chinese cartoons are like this. The bad guys must be as bad as the bones, and the good guys must be very noble and naive.
As for the effect of three-dimensional animation. There are currently three commercialized stereoscopic display technologies, polarization splitting, red and blue filtering, and liquid crystal time-sharing display. Depending on the actual situation, monsters vs. aliens should belong to polarization beam splitting; when you look at the screen with the naked eye, you can see the image, but there are some ghosts. This kind of three-dimensional movie will be very tiring to watch for a long time, because the imaging of ordinary movies has no depth of field and the eyes have no focusing action. The virtual aberrations seem shocking at first glance, but after a long time, the eyes are always in virtual focus at different positions, especially in scenes with many moving objects and different scales and directions. The eyes are very tired. On the contrary, in the scene of a bouncing ball at the beginning of the movie, the background objects are all still, and only the ball running around at different depths of field looks more comfortable. The eyes provided by the movie theater cannot be adjusted in size. For a giant syndrome like me, it is really wearing small shoes. After half an hour, my temples are completely numb.
View more about Monsters vs. Aliens reviews
