Because of this, it is "the future of the gods".
(Huuuh.....)
In the past, there was a category of people in the world that, on the surface, were no different from ordinary white men and women; some went to middle school to work and deliver pizza, some grew up in the countryside and became reporters. Some like to wear black underpants outside their outer trousers and go out at night.
Some are a private school, some are a family of four, and some are alone on a hot motorcycle.
In the past, although these people were well-known in their communities and contributed to the humanity in their communities, they had a common shortcoming.
---For each movie, there can be only one superhero, or only one superhero combination.
In past movies, Clark has not read the Spider-Man report in the newspaper, and Batman cannot take turns playing mahjong with watchmen at night.
There seems to be a layer of powerful and impenetrable energy that divides them between different parallel universes. Each universe has an earth, and each earth can only be saved by a named hero (hero combination). (Even the place where "Batman and Robin" and the place where Batman appears alone are two parallel universes)
How lonely.
But that is the past.
In the future, the parallel universes in which the heroes live will finally intersect, not just intersect, they will indeed merge into one world.
In the future, superheroes will make a grand debut one by one with their own titles, but the stories of their experiences are intertwined with other heroes, forming an intricate network.
The following films appeared in the future:
"Caption American", "Thor", "The Avengers" and "The incredible Hulk"
Unlike the past, Iron Man will appear in some of these movies. Similarly, the stories of the heroes in these films will be interspersed with other hero stories, including Iron Man's main story.
Series. . . .
I see this kind of future, and I don't know how I feel about it, but the future has already happened.
The first is that Hollywood has one more Studio-Marvel. A
long time ago (from the perspective of the future) Marvel decided to make all the superheroes covered by its copyright "the same world" and "the same dream"
-of course, heroes who have already sold out. , You can only stay alone in the world built by other people’s studios. It’s hard to come back. So Spider-Man (Colombia), Xmen (Fox), Blade Warrior (New Line), Fantastic Four (Fox), Daredevil and Elektra (Fox) ) These will stay in their own little world forever.
But it's not absolute. After being played with by Ang Lee, the Hulk returned to Marvel from Universal's hands, ready to go crazy in the future. If the current owner wants to buy it back, there are still some cheap heroes who will return to their roots.
In order to realize the merger of the heroic universe, Marvel found a great man-Joss Whedon,
the bird man is the founder of famous dramas such as Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Firefly, Angels, and a family member in the comics industry.
But more importantly, this writer understands how to build a grand on-screen "family relationship". In addition to letting him be the director of Avenger, he will become the "chief director and screenwriter" of all upcoming Marvel films.
This position has never been heard in Hollywood in the past.
Unprecedented.
With this game of chess created by Marvel, Hollywood is currently just watching the fire from the other side. The biggest opponent, Warner Brother, holds several times as many celebrity heroes as DC Comic, but it is not certain yet. The gods should be brought together. Only when Marvel takes advantage, he will chase the wind. In that future, Superman and Batman will be able to fight hand in hand under director Christopher Nolan.
Then in the future, we will finally break the parallel universe wall created by copyright for the first time. The first time we saw comics on the screen, we realized things-hero cameos as early as 70 years ago.
But how many viewers will not be aesthetically fatigued because of too many action scenes?
How many people persist in their enthusiasm for these fictional characters, and regard them as a real and credible family?
This important task depends on the director's skill.
As Jon Javreau's second Iron man, I saw it more difficult than the first. Does this good director who created "Swingers" no longer know how to fool the audience? The flying scene is far less exciting than an F1 car. Numerous clues and themes are blocked together and weaken each other (father's love, peace vs. belligerence, the right to create and invention, the separation between lovers, the trust and confrontation between friends) make it impossible to concentrate-even the climax of creating new elements , All seem so cumbersome.
In fact, the audience does not need to look at such a variety of emotional experiences. What the audience wants to see is an emotional experience, but because of the major risks in the dilemma, this experience has a profound meaning beyond the ordinary.
There is no harm in jokes, but unlike the proverb, laughter can't help the film cure diseases.
View more about Iron Man 2 reviews
