At the end of the film, who remembers that human flesh searches and Internet violence once led to the death of a depressed patient even if he was not innocent? At this time, come back and watch the first episode again. The main participants (cat lovers) discussed this matter just like okay people. If this is really a documentary, I feel that this film fully exposes the hypocrisy in the bones of these people. On the surface, it is in the name of picking out cat abusers and perverts and finding the murderer. In fact, it is doing something like human flesh search. For unreasonable and illegal things such as cyber violence and spying on other people’s addresses, you must know that they are not police detectives and do not have the power to enforce the law. Moreover, this also contributed to the murderer's arrogance. This phenomenon can exist in a country that claims to be "democratic and rule of law" and "procedural justice" all day long. It cannot but be said to be a kind of irony. One last point, this film is always an understatement to the real victim, Lin Jun, and does not rectify his name. On the contrary, most of the time is showing the process of tracing. This method will also make people feel that they are consuming the dead. And in the end, he successfully dumped the audience and fully reflected the American double standard.
View more about Don't F**k with Cats: Hunting an Internet Killer reviews
