Buck’s two (or three) stories make people a little bit unable to grasp the point. The film itself may be intended to convey the leadership of several masters that Buck has experienced in human society and then return to himself, but the three stories tell another story. It is more delicate and makes people unable to feel the vicissitudes of life. There is also the point about Buck chasing the rabbit, and there are other points that echo. The number of appearances is a bit more. Finally, I will complain about the villain of the gold rush. It is really inexplicable. I feel that this animal-themed movie is actually very good to poke the audience. This film is a bit similar to "Togo", but in terms of narration, I prefer the latter with animals as the protagonist, but after all, animals have no personality (or the transformation of animals in performance). I tend to think that the nature is like this.) The display of his kind nature is only moving, emotionally plump, but there is no ideological idea. To put it bluntly, it is necessary to convey something to the audience. At the beginning, but looking at the main idea, the expression itself is some relatively abstract and macroscopic things. There are still some points that surprise me, such as the intention of the big bad wolf that Buck sees at night, and several places with different owners. Pushing the helpless Buck to draw the picture
View more about The Call of the Wild reviews
