American soldiers can't fight without women? Women’s rights watching war movies will irritate women. They are just a tool for people to have fun and boost morale. md. Most of the popular short bulletins are scolding the kind-hearted U.S. military, saying that he doesn’t know how to obey and harms his teammates. He gave a small report that a man likes to fight so much, then you can abuse each other so much. Don’t tm involve women. Why should women be so miserable. When a woman chooses to take refuge in a powerful enemy, she will be like a French woman with a shaved head after the war. Choosing to become an ordinary person will face the risk of being robbed, raped and murdered at any time like this film. Watching this film deeply realizes what the nature of most men is. They have no sympathy for the tragic encounters of Vietnamese women at all. I wish I was a member of the evil American army, just like Sean Penn’s lines. The essence of a man: gun is used to play and penis is used to fight. Every girl should watch this war movie. Thank you for our current life. In peace, thank our army for not being like the U.S. army
This film is really mixed with emotions. Not only the film itself touched me, but the barrage outside the film deeply shocked me. Most of the women in war films are just embellishments to sprinkle some love dog blood, and they often appear as prostitutes. Before I watched this movie, I thought it was a dog-blood love or that the U.S. military was looking for prostitutes. I didn’t expect that like the male protagonist, that group of soldiers would actually rob a civilian girl, then gang-raped, and then mercilessly. Kill. Behind is the male protagonist running around seeking justice for Vietnamese women. From here on, the barrage began to scold the male lead, and all kinds of unthinkable speeches appeared. Here are some examples: "Don't report, make things smaller" "It's unlucky to be a comrade-in-arms with him" "I'm still a childish child" "This kind of person who harms his teammates should be taken out and killed" "This is a villain, take care of things. I’m a small soldier." "Reporting all day long." "I’m sure to keep him from coming back." "Send him to a military court and say that he did it." "A rib" "I don't see this kind of pretense most" "He is definitely not a qualified soldier" "On the battlefield, he shivered, and when he got off the battlefield, he said cruel words in front of his teammates." "A rib is really speechless." "Only I can say that such a person is not suitable to be a soldier." "If you are not ruthless enough, don't be a soldier and don't go to war." "Abominable informer" "All comrades, just sell teammates like this"
These barrage really shocked me. In the eyes of these people, the protagonist’s sense of justice is not suitable for being a soldier and betraying his teammates? So many barrages do not support the male protagonist's approach, but feel that he betrayed his brother. This shows that these people have never thought that it is wrong to rape and kill women. It is wrong for the protagonist not to do it with them. These people reminded me of the famous saying of a guest from Taiwan, "What's the point of not robbing women in wars". It can be seen how foul the original male thought is. Burning, killing, looting is just a testimony of masculinity and a testimony of so-called brotherhood. This shows how important it is to enter the army for ideological reform. I'm not a feminist, and I can't appreciate and support the extreme feminism on the Internet, but today I can't help but scold Guo Nan for the first time, and most men in the world are really disgusting. I hope that every woman will watch this movie, especially when I watch it with a barrage on iQiyi, and they will understand how necessary it is for men to ideological education and how important it is to protect themselves. In the development of human civilization, males still haven't got rid of the most primitive animality. People who obviously have mothers do not have the most basic respect and understanding of women.
Secondly, many people boast that the United States is facing the problem head-on, and knows how to reflect. This kind of film can be made by the Americans. I’ll hehe. There are many American war films, and there are many reflecting on anti-war. Unfortunately, the United States reflects every day, starting with the Vietnam War, and reflecting to this day, the war has not stopped, one after another, every time After playing each time, there are new background materials to shoot. What is the use of filming one film after another? Has the problem been solved? This is the trauma of the Vietnam War in 1989. It is about the good of the individual against the evil of the group. On the same theme, there is also a killing force in 2019. Thirty years have passed. The problems that should exist in the US military still exist. From Vietnam to the Middle East, the US military still kills civilians and rapes women. Is there any change in the behavior of American soldiers? Not to mention civilian women, there are countless violations of female soldiers within the US military. As early as the 90s, there were scandals involving the daughter of the general and the Star Stripe banner. Are the female soldiers in the US now equal? Some people always say that Europe and the United States dare to shoot everything, and that they dare to take out all kinds of dark sides. They also say that South Korea dares to shoot. Why? It’s not because the West has ruled the world for hundreds of years, and the United States has the hegemony of the U.S. dollar. The democratic system has spread to the world. People are confident that Western culture is the first in the world. So they can criticize whatever they want, because no matter how critical they are, the strength lies There, most people still think that this is a powerful country, a perfect system, and no matter how many problems it is, it is worth looking forward to. As for South Korea, it goes without saying that the chaebol controls everything. There is also an American father who controls the general direction. The parasite creators include big capitalists. People just show the reality to the Korean people bloody. Can Koreans change? It's not a lifetime entry. The chaebol group is proud. As long as there is a little problem in China, a bunch of people will rise to the system immediately, and the news will not be free. It seems that as long as the system changes and the literature and art are released, the problems will be solved. What is the difference between these people's thinking and those who advised the Soviet Union to adopt shock therapy? If filming and engaging in arts and finance can solve the problem, what kind of engineering and science are you studying? How easy is it to study liberal arts? Why do Europe and the United States prohibit China from learning other people's high-tech, but not forbid us from learning other people's liberal arts, art and business?
In reality, isn’t the situation facing China a bit like a movie. The protagonist is alone and weak against four teammates and officers at all levels. Everyone thinks that he is wrong. How difficult it is for the good of individuals to fight against the evils of the group. ! Because China is a system different from most countries in the world, many people think that this system is wrong. Why is China less criticized? Because the outside world is full of critics, good things will be splashed with dirty water, and China will always be stigmatized. If you are opposed, go to the Internet and check out more foreign media. I believe these are the criticisms that some people like. If we ourselves do not praise and maintain balance internally, if everyone grasps every small point and amplifies the criticism every day, then we will slowly deny everything ourselves, and eventually we can only move towards the disintegration of the Soviet Union.
View more about Casualties of War reviews
