Before the seventh episode, I thought this drama was an adaptation of real events. The last two episodes are very dramatic, but they are also wonderful. Looking at the show from a female perspective, I saw a mother who has not become her son's best friend, so it is not enough to judge whether her son is a murderer. At the same time, she attributed part of the mistake to herself, because she didn't know and guide her children more, so she couldn't let her go, nor her son. When the husband firmly believes that he is not the son, she cannot believe the son. But what I don't quite understand is why she was so shaken to learn that her husband lied to her father in prison. After all, the child has no right to choose his own parents. Three days after the death of his classmate, the son made up stories on the Internet. The parents never thought that this reflected the pressure of campus bullying on their children. In my opinion, this simultaneous behavior also shows that the little boy is not a murderer. How could the murderer go to the Internet to show off after he succeeded? The murder itself should have given him enough pleasure. In order to get rid of the crime, it is impossible for him to take the initiative to publish the details on the Internet and leave him with a handle. It must be that he didn't kill anyone, and seeing the person who bullied him was killed, he imagined that he did it himself, thus getting emotional vent. In the eyes of one of my bystanders, it is obvious that my son is not sad about the death of his classmate, and even happy. As a child, he didn't understand what it meant for a family to lose a child, and he didn't understand what death meant. For his world, there is just one missing person who often bullies him and brings pain to his life. He is moved and happy because of this. I don't think it is abnormal. Maybe the boy did not understand the importance of life and death, but this was not enough to characterize him as a murderer. For other people in the community, I think more emotions are just thinking that this might happen in my own home, so I am afraid, sympathetic, not painful. After all, the whip was not hit on me. Adults have tasted the hardships of society and life, but still can't empathize with them, let alone a child who is bullied by the victim every day. During the whole process, the couple talked with each other, discussed countermeasures, and supported each other, but they never asked whether the child was okay. Except at the beginning of the incident, no one suspected that it was their own son. As the mother of the client, the spirit of the heroine has been greatly affected, let alone as the child of the client. Maybe they have never fully believed that the son did not do it, so they subconsciously assumed that the son would not be upset and afraid. In this process, the heroine is too busy to take care of herself, and she has no time to take care of her children. The little boy also behaved more calmly, looking like he was used to the emotional support his parents were absent from. However, when the hostess needed to confide in others, she did not talk to her husband about her feelings. Perhaps because the husband lied to herself about the fact that her father was a murderer, she no longer trusted him 100%, so she wanted to talk to outsiders. It is said that mother Zegang, a mentally fragile mother, is disastrous for a family, because once her spirit is hit, her state will definitely affect the family. In this drama, both the son and the father are used to taking care and digesting their emotions by themselves, so they didn’t expect to take good care of the heroine’s mental condition, and when this situation did not affect them, the heroine would From entanglement to collapse quickly.
View more about Defending Jacob reviews
