At first I thought it was a suspense drama, but when I waited for the update, I turned to the English version of the novel. After reading it, I found that as a novel, it is about defending Jacob in a different way after a crime occurs. It pays more attention to social ethics than suspense. It has a higher intention than ordinary suspense dramas, but most viewers treat it. When watching a suspense drama, I will force a result.
I have to say that novels are more reasonable than adaptations. In the novel, Hope is dead, and Jacob also got rid of the suspicion of murder, but the mother saw the blood on the white shirt. From the beginning, she believed that her son did not kill, to doubt, to regret that she doubted her son, to fall into doubt again, to despair and collapse. It seems very natural. The first seven episodes are very close to the original, and one point is deducted for the adaptation of the last episode.
When Andy asked if his father killed Patz, a conversation was also removed: Patz was being tried alive, Jacob still has the possibility of clearing the suspicion, Patz’s suicide will only end the case, and Jacob just escaped in the eyes of others. The law, but you can never get rid of the suspicion of murder. In the drama, the case is just withdrawn, not innocent, a free man, not an innocent man. Here, Grandpa used his own method to defend Jacob and asked the question, but he did a bad thing with his kindness, and it is a pity that the screenwriter did not show it.
Parents are also defending Jacob in different ways. My father is defending his own point of view, so I won’t repeat it; I really like the section describing the car accident in the novel. Jacob sits in the back row as usual, and his mother didn’t criticize him because he didn’t wear a seat belt as usual. At 140, Jacob saw his mother loosen the seat belt. Jacob had no time to fasten his seat belt, bang!
In addition, in the novel, Andy is a 50-year-old, middle-aged civil servant who has a son. The annoying public prosecutor Neal was trained by Andy. Andy knows all his methods, advantages and disadvantages. Basically It can be said that he is holding Neal by the nose. From this point of view, Chris Peach does not fit the image of a middle-aged elite civil servant with a long career. The eldest lady said that she bought a tight-fitting swimsuit and thought she could see the swimsuit peach, but the result was still tight, bad reviews, one point deducted, hahaha.
While watching the show, I was still wondering, Patz hanged himself and strangled the police to find out. Listening to the analysis of soy oil in the TV series, the pedophile suicide and the scene of the car accident are Andy's brain supplementing the facts. It is not the fact that he realized it. It is true that these two are closed spaces, and no outsider knows exactly what happened. European and American dramas have evolved the shooting method of flashbacks, interspersed, facts, and facts. Domestic dramas are still accustomed to the traditional method of treating the audience as fools and taking the narrative and seeing the audience as the truth. Even if there are flashbacks, they are afraid of the audience. I don't understand, I can't wait to engrave the remarks in the lines on the screen. The shooting method is very good. It is worth adding a star.
View more about Defending Jacob reviews
