Four stars for the first two episodes.
Personal feeling: The protagonist in the first two episodes is the Vampire Count, and the third episode is the villain.
I've heard of unfinished, but I didn't expect the third episode to be so different from the first two episodes. It's not about the good or bad, but about the background, environment, plot, and the male host. In the first two episodes, Dracula had a certain animality in him, and he was sometimes dominated by instinct, which undoubtedly made him even more dangerous. In the third episode, the background is moved to the metropolis, and the earl has automatically become "civilized"?
In addition, Lucy’s character set in the third episode was totally unable to convince me. In the play, the people who made Dracula a little interested in besides Lucy are Jonathan and Agatha, and Lucy and these two together give people the feeling that they are completely asymmetric (all evaluations are only for the characters in the play). In the first episode, Jonathan is full of compassion. I felt that he was about to collapse several times, but he never compromised with Dracula (personally likes his story line, including his love with Gina); Van Hai Not to mention Xin, who is unique, humorous, intelligent, and very charming (although this character is easily reminiscent of Sherlock in the summer of God); in the third episode, the choice of Lucy may be to shape A representative of a new world that is young, beautiful, proud, lonely and empty, drunk in life, dreams of death, and happy in time. Of course, the most important thing is that she is not afraid of death. But the problem is that I didn't get the charm that this character should have at all. If it were put in a regular horror film, she would be the first to die. When in the cemetery, facing the dead in the tomb and the little baby who crawled out, she was completely irrational (compare Jonathan's performance in the first episode), and of course she did not have any fear. Perhaps it was this that attracted the earl? But I am more inclined that her fearlessness is because she actually doesn't understand what is happening. In the subsequent plot, the little baby appeared in her bedroom, and she was as scared as ordinary people (in the cemetery, she can be said to be under the protection of the earl, enjoying special treatment, can not help but think of many plots of the cool king of the sky...); When she was a little baby, she turned her head obediently and didn’t look at it. Halo. In the first episode, Agatha has always wanted to find traces of God’s existence, in fact, the "miracle" was on Jonathan); after death, her soul kept shouting for help, and did not pay attention to Dracula’s reminder not to be cremated. , It can be seen that she is still stuck in the cognition that she is in a relationship with the villain, the chief vampire earl, and is ignorant of the consequences to bear. Coupled with her rebirth performance after death, I have always wondered whether she really is not afraid of death or secondary. If you put her in the environment of the first two episodes, can this character still be established? If she still has such an "outstanding" performance in the gloomy labyrinth castle or the heavy fog on the ship where the dead people are shrouded in the sea, instead of the clean and tidy cemetery under the street lamp, she may have a more three-dimensional image. (Insert, for works of this kind of theme, I personally think that atmosphere is very important. The environment of the modern city in the third episode is completely separated from the first two episodes.) And if this character is not established, the first two episodes
Finally confessed Jack's face.
View more about Dracula reviews
