(I haven't written a long lineup for N years.)
Oh, yes, I thought that this "Holmes" could not be faithful to the original book-Little Carrot Candy plays Holmes! He is not even English! Jude Law plays Watson! He is so handsome and unassuming! The series of action scenes in the trailer are also very different from the gentleman flavor of the original. When I walked into the theater, I was ready to watch a joke.
I fell in love with this film in less than ten minutes. The dark and dark green tones and the thick and mottled props set meticulously wrap the rhythm of modernity, making people almost imperceptible to the 21st century implied by rapid editing and a large number of special effects.
The shape of the radish is not as cold as the previous Sherlock Holmes, with a gentleman's demeanor, and more dynamic and joyful. I was not very optimistic at first. But his interpretation, the Sherlock Holmes depicted in this script, actually matches the Sherlock Holmes in memory everywhere.
As mentioned above, if you are familiar with Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes, then you must admit that Sherlock Holmes is indeed unruffled most of the time. He takes drugs and plays the violin at inappropriate times. He shoots the gun in the living room on a whim. Frequently doing stinking chemical experiments, he can always make up as another person. He is agile and unrelenting in attacking opponents. He is full of black humor. He likes to satirize Scotland Yard and Watson. But Watson probably does too. The closest person to him in the world. . .
And these, this version of "Sherlock Holmes" has been shown, maybe a little cartoonish, maybe not as polite as an old-school English gentleman, but I don't mind at all. Besides, Holmes probably didn't treat gentlemen as the same thing. He is a genius who is only separated from the madman, and Carrot's interpretation highlights this point.
Watson. In Watson's own narrative, the reader gets the impression of honesty and loyalty. Yes, he is loyal, but who said that loyalty has to behave like a loyal dog? His honesty is mainly compared with Holmes. It is not clever enough to guess who is better than Holmes. He is a soldier. He was born and died following most of Holmes’ adventures. He wrote a good article. He is of marriageable age. So, if the film is reasonably extended, what's wrong with portraying him as a witty, brave and handsome man. Woolen cloth? Besides, Jude Law hasn't been so handsome anymore in the past two years, so it's just right. He and Carrot should be qualified to be admitted to the harem by the uncles.
Watson and Holmes. It's really not surprising if Holmes and Watson are seen as a pair. Originally, they were a couple, and they couldn't get away from Meng, and Meng didn't get out of focus. Watson is about to get married, and Holmes really disapproves and displeases; they usually like to quarrel like an old wife; Watson is not at ease with Holmes, Holmes depends on Watson; these original works are all written, why everyone seems to have discovered Inexplicable excitement like the New World?
So, don't get excited, they are just like that, no extra imagination is needed; the film is not glamorous, although there is a nude scene in the trailer. Just that one. The film is a very pure detective story. The suspense is set up properly, and then layers are peeled off. The audience's mind has not digested the scene of the previous scene. The latter turning point has already followed, and the audience's wisdom is never underestimated. In the process, Holmes's ingenuity was well understood, bold and careful, and these heroic traits were displayed without compromise. This is probably what makes my book fans the most heart-warming. Although it is a bit exaggerated, Holmes is still Holmes. He can stand the test of time and stand the renewal. It doesn't matter if the shape is not like. The portrayal of Sherlock Holmes in this play is to focus on a certain aspect of his character, which is more neurotic and crazier. This version of him is very aura. As long as you don't care about sticking to the image of a gentleman in the past, you can appreciate him.
As for the character Irene, who made Holmes only like this woman? After all, he is not Tiger Woods, and the material is not so rich. The screenwriter had to rewrite Irene to make it more interesting and more in line with the times. Moreover, Professor Moriarty can be brought out from her to prepare for the sequel, and it can be considered as the best use.
Seeing this, you should already understand that I like this film very much. Like "Avatar", "Avatar" must be liked, it cannot be denied that it is better; "Sherlock Holmes" is like it from the bottom of my heart, it is a cup of Yakun milk tea with just the right taste. I like its production design. The old London scenes are completely in line with the ancient romantic imagination; I like the early chemical and physical experiments and can still be understood and operated by ordinary people; I like its soundtrack, light and humorous without losing tension, and the main instrument seems to be a certain A native British musical instrument; I like the countless details in it, which is in line with the original and full of innovative and entertaining spirit; not to mention the humorous dialogue full of the film. One of the characteristics of Holmes is that he will not speak directly, and people with high IQ will not speak around the corners. , The mind will spin idly, this is the same as the hamster must run hundreds of laps to eat.
The ending subtitles came out, one by one sketch-like pictures were scanned, and the credits appeared. The picture for the costume design is the scene where Holmes is naked and only covers a pillow. Laughing and leaving the theater.
View more about Sherlock Holmes reviews
