The witty Twitter netizen spoke my heart. From left to right from episode 1 to episode 3, as shown in the figure:
A cliff fell.
I really love episodes 1 and 2. But tm Wanwanmei thinks that it is impossible to guard against?
Episode 3: Meaningless and repetitive lines, the rhythm is not well grasped. Comparing the digging/buried clues?? puzzle solving/reversal in the 1st and 2nd episodes, the whole episode of the 3rd episode seems very smooth and smooth. The character of Lucy, the second female, is very embarrassing. This is what the second bungee girl looks like. Sitting with Dracula and discussing death makes people laugh; Dracula was attracted by Lucy's "fearless death" traits and attracted her. Blood, together in the cemetery began to talk, the story line began to deviate from the theme to the car accident. To clarify: she is not afraid of death, but "too ignorant so I don't understand". The "wake-up" to see clearly in the end is very cliché. This version of Lucy is a wise interpretation of Lucy Westernra, who is a friend of Mina in Bram Stoker's original "Dracula", who was charmed by Dracula and finally fell into the dark??
The screenwriter and director seem to want to follow the line of Shakespeare’s works. After facing the heart, what has always been avoided and believed to collapse before the tragic hero who heads towards self-destruction, but after the filming, it was dull and uninteresting, and extremely hasty. Perfunctory, the last 30 minutes was almost the scene of a high-speed car accident. It can be seen that the screenwriter and director have deep ideas, but only made a semi-finished ending.
The signature Gothic horror and horror in this episode are also gone. Every time the Victorian Gothic literature is moved to modern society, it has become a four-dimensional image, which is simply unsatisfactory. Do you dare to think that Dracula is hunting with tinder (approximate Pao software similar to Momo) in modern times? Do you dare to think that Dracula sends text messages and also type emoji? It's too difficult for a 500-year-old old man :(
I like to watch Claes Bang’s ass, but I've had my eyes full in episode 1, so don't take it off in episode 3. Generally speaking, Claes Bang performed Dracula very brilliantly. It is the Dracula in my mind. I can and I can.
The concept that the billboard made by bbc wanted to express: the things that scared you really shaped you. (Dracula’s head was born from the shadow of the bloody stake),
Episode 3 used a whole episode to express this concept: Dracula was born because of his fear and yearning for death and the sun, and was destined to be destroyed. But shooting a good concept into such a boring and perfunctory way can be considered a skill.
Leave the legend of Count Dracula in Victorian England and Romania. He is tired.
But Claes Bang is really good in modern suits, I don’t even have a drop.
Finally: I'm going to repeat the first 2 episodes a billion times.
—————Manual dividing line————————————
The repo for episodes 1 and 2 written yesterday (it has nothing to do with episode 3??):
Faithful to the characteristics of Dracula's characters and the large-scale plot in the original work, there are many close-ups to pay tribute to the versions of Christopher Lee and Bela lugosi in the last century, reappearing many classic passages, and adding re-creations and reversals.
Dracula has no love brains, no dog blood of past and present life to talk about love, no human struggles of good and evil, just pure sexy evil, focusing on shaping an evil hero, a cruel beast, an evil version of james bond (麦哥Original words), he likes humans, because humans are his food, but he also likes to chat with people as company. Tall and dark, the appearance of a middle-aged person of about 40 or 50 years old is daunting when he is not speaking, and when he speaks, he speaks surprisingly with black humor and strange charm. The characters are very three-dimensional, and I fainted.
View more about Dracula reviews
