In terms of content, it can be said that it is a question worth pondering for everyone. While the Internet facilitates everyone’s communication, widens the boundaries of communication, and gives a wider audience the right to supervise, does it mean that cyber violence is also breeding on the other hand.
This is not the first time this issue has been discussed, but the presentation of real cases can attract enough attention.
I give two shortcomings that I think. One is that the title is different from the actual situation. The whole point of this documentary is not just cat insults and killings, it is more of a series of online investigations of cat insults. The other is the suicide of the innocent boy. Only a small fragment understates the harm caused by cyber violence. I know he is just a small episode in the documentary. But what I still hope is that the documentary can face up to the attitudes and actions of the abused netizens after such incidents come out, or the society's response to this matter. He was also one of the victims of violence.
Of course, this documentary still shines brightly. It is not a traditional TV documentary, and there is not enough gorgeous lens language. It took a lot of effort to get to the scene of the case and restore the process of the incident in a whirlwind. A lot of web pop-up shots and interview shots of the person involved were used throughout, which reproduced the truth very calmly and objectively. The other is the novelty of the subject matter. It is no longer the same as usual, but simply gives the prosecutor's process of solving the case. Instead, letting the views of netizens and the process of exploring the perpetrator as the main line of this documentary is extremely groundbreaking. One of the explorations. It is a brand new show that every netizen is a living individual, a talent in a certain field, and their combination can produce a different color.
View more about Don't F**k with Cats: Hunting an Internet Killer reviews
