Many people have read about Schrödinger’s cat, but there are only superficial similarities. The content of the film is completely contrary to the above theory. The three found that the camera seemed to be both observers and participants, and then they thought of Schrödinger's theorem, and then they were distorted. In fact, the theory that the observer changes the test results in Schrödinger's theorem is contrary to the film, at least from the end to the end. Knowing that what actually happened cannot be changed.
Well, whether the film is a single timeline or a parallel universe theory, I think there are all of them, and there is no contradiction. First of all, the most common loophole in this kind of film is the problem of chicken laying eggs: the first time they are on the window Post a note to remind yourself before 8 o'clock, or deliberately convey information, is it happening in this world? Obviously not. This world is relatively lagging behind. In the world of this film, they are obviously following the trend, following the future self in the photo. Then the future self is another parallel world. In that world, they regretted it. Decided, wanted to change myself, posted, but useless facts have happened, but they inadvertently reminded them in this world. In the same way, no matter if the hostess posted a post in the morning or they reminded themselves through a photo message in the evening, nothing has changed, or it is not because of what they do in this world that they have changed themselves. They are being "advanced" by another world. 'S message has changed. Consistent with the words of the male and female scientific colleagues in the film, you think it will be affected, but in fact it is only affected by you at other times.
This is very fun. The second male in the world "early" discovered the machine. Assuming it is the first world and no one has sent them a message before, then he won't win the horse betting, but he thought of using the machine. Remind the previous self, and reminded him in every game that it would not hurt to see what changed in him anyway, but he did not change, but he was inadvertently seen by the self who "lags" in this world and enriched the self in another world. Others are the same. For example, the heroine in the "early" world wants to change, she also sends a message, but she changes herself in this world, and she in this world is also stupid, thinking that she has to post a message step by step according to the message of the photo. I thought I changed my boyfriend by posting a post. . . But his article may be seen by himself in other worlds. .
The setting of the camera is very interesting. Think about it carefully. Regardless of whether you take a picture of the present or the future or parallel to a certain moment in the world, the essence is to copy or reproduce. It is impossible to create, such as painting. It must not be said that the camera created the work. This setting clearly tells us that what has happened in a certain world in the photo. Another thing everyone discussed is whether they can change themselves through future photos. I want to say that none of you have defined "change". Is it changing a certain moment or ending? -Every time they put the same POSE to the photo, sometimes it is not exactly the same, and it is impossible. Then it will be regarded as the same at that level, and it will not be "dead"? In addition, what is the ending? It is a relatively long time, how long is that? If it grows to the destruction of the universe, then it is certain that they cannot be changed, and even the parallel universe is meaningless-different processes will eventually be destroyed. What I want to say is that they observe the overlap between the "early" world and their world. Of course, this is random. For example, for the first time, they think they will have a party the next day, and the photo also shows that this is just a single event. The difference is not much, but in other things, the two times may be very different. This is also like the characteristics of the parallel world, which may be different in one or two points. The others are exactly the same as this world, which makes you confused whether it is your own world or the other. In the world, many people who watched the film may have been deceived by this.
This is the core of the film, a one-line story based on the parallel world theory. I feel that the "chicken" of this story is easier to explain, because they were motivated the first time they sent a message, and the beginning of some film cycles is not easy to explain.
View more about Time Lapse reviews
