The national conditions are different, and many of the characters' behaviors and personalities in the play are not very understandable.
For example, when the protagonist, Ruiyis, faced the career of leading the mentor, Jera, and killed him with his own hands, on the other hand, he treated various welfare and preferential treatments to the residents of his own community, and finally carried a heavy debt. This kind of self-sacrificing Min’s behavior is too sage, and he has always claimed to be a businessman. No matter how kind a businessman is, he cannot use his family property to subsidize others like this. This is not a so-called heroic quality.
Let’s talk about the policeman Mammda, who has always been opposed to the protagonist. His appearance is a very unreliable image. When the police in which country comes to arrest people, they must first change clothes and then perform an awkward dance? The next step in shaping his character is to appear as a good policeman with a sense of justice and principle. Then, why did he shoot and kill the protagonist Reis in the field without a trial? This TM personality change is too sudden, and the Indian police are too wild~
What kind of talent is worthy of being called a hero? It is his behavior and character that has a good side and a bad side, and he has considerable power in society! This film exaggerates the protagonist’s good side, and basically touches his evil in one stroke. Therefore, the audience is presented with a saint-like figure, and the power he holds can only be regarded as a middle level. So I think that the performance of the protagonist cannot be called a hero, at best, it can only be regarded as a hero. To put it plainly, it is at the level of a village tyrant and a city tyrant. If you dare not to be obedient, the boss can pinch to death at will. The protagonist still overestimated his own strength and rashly opposed the first minister, which is really irrational.
View more about Raees reviews
