But this one has no choice.
The picture, color tone, and lens scheduling are simply forcing people to think, so I split into three parts at the beginning, watching the plot, while pondering the picture and colors, and thinking about what this guy is going to say (some people are used to watching the plot introduction first Or look at the information after searching, I can’t). Fortunately, the progress of the story is relatively abstract, otherwise I can't really take care of it.
From the high platform and the deep sea, I was waiting for the first key to appear. I think whether or not I can understand the key determines whether I can understand what the film wants to say.
The two brothers quarreled and chased each other. The moment their mother turned around, she said "Your father is back." I think it was the father. How can a father who has been away from home for many years live with these two sons with very different personalities?
However, that meal changed this idea.
The wife and the wife’s mother were sitting on both sides of the door, and the father walked in through the door.
The lens always makes you look up at his face, behind him is a very clean gray tone with light. For a moment, I only thought of the word "Supreme", God and Christ.
And everyone else was shot slightly bent down, which completely echoed this impression.
Just a male host who has been away from home for many years, why should he use such status and temperament to outline him?
Although the following story can be said to be an entangled conflict between an arbitrary and tough father and two sons, I was always shrouded in the image of Christ at the table and couldn't tell myself. Redemption, betrayal, love, forgiveness, destiny, dominance... I don't believe in saying that this represents patriarchy. It's too high too. To understand Chinese jokes, to know the lives of the Chinese people, to understand Russian fables, you must put it back into the general environment of Russia. Apart from the changes in the system and society, I can't think of anything else that can afford it. Such a big hat, and I have no extra brain capacity to continue this Andreher conjecture.
Having experienced rejection, temptation, hope, and resistance, it has played down the other plots, deliberately and deliberately not to tell the little iron box, only the three of the father and son are left.
Only loneliness is left.
Ivan is a person, Andre is a person, and his father is a person. In the end, everyone can only have himself. All you once thought to dominate you, influence you, whether you use love or hate, are closely tied to you Those people, those things, after all, have nothing to do with me.
Whether it's hesitating or strong, it's just that an individual has to face his own destiny.
After reading it and checking the information quickly, it turned out to be a political fable. It proves once again that I have always been conscious but not awakened. I never thought that his father was a symbol of the country?
PS
has such a funny passage, Ivan said to Andre very unhappily: Dad Dad, you are always Dad’s and Dad’s! But
it sounds like Ivan is saying: "Dad East" and "Dad West" !
I am happy to speak out.
View more about The Return reviews
