Big-picture movies, small-scale heroes

Allison 2022-04-20 09:02:24

I looked at the reviews on the Internet, and the reviews were mixed, but in general, the reviews still felt that the film was more conscientious. In the era when special effects are flying all over the sky, there are not many action movies that are made with fists and flesh, and the tribute at the end of the film is also very atmospheric, which makes an action movie feel emotional at once, and it becomes a force.

The fighting in the film is also very exciting. First punches and then legs and then grabbing. The internal skills of weapons are five-in-one (probably so? I can't remember...) The boxing part is not unfolded. In the part of the grabbing hand, there are many close-up gestures, the performance of hitting the ribs and grasping the joints is relatively in place and obvious, and the final splitting of the muscles and bones is also ruthless. In the weapons section, when Fan Shaohuang took the stick and Wang Baoqiang took the knife, I knew that Brother Xuzhu was going to kneel. One inch long and one inch strong, one inch short one inch dangerous, although the stick is powerful and has a wide range of defense, it still won't work when the opponent's rank is much higher than you. Sure enough, he was hit close and his throat was cut. In the end, when Wang Baoqiang and Donnie Yen took the bamboo poles long to each other, Dan, as the boss of the Heyi Sect, was relatively proficient in the concept of extending weapons as his hands, and the angles of the sticks were more tricky and varied. In short, the martial arts part is quite exciting, and it is really enjoyable for laymen to watch.

In the play, the phrase "Kung Fu is a killing technique" is repeated all the time, and I have been thinking about whether Kung Fu is a killing technique or not, and what is the true meaning of Kung Fu? After thinking about it for a long time, I came to a conclusion, which is more inclined to the standard of ancient knights. Kungfu is really a killing technique, but it is not an "indiscriminate killing technique". Killing is to protect more people, so I say that the two protagonists in this film, Feng Yuxiu and Xiahouwu, are small people.

Let's talk about Xiahou Wu first, he is more like an ordinary hero in martial arts novels. After learning a good kung fu, I know that I want to open a martial arts hall to be an instructor and develop martial arts. Guo Jing didn't do well at this point. If he didn't pass on his peerless martial arts well, he would directly repay the country with his death. If there were more of him like this, then Chinese martial arts would have been wiped out long ago. Therefore, I personally think Guo Jing is a hero with a big pattern and a martial artist with a small pattern. As for Xiahou Wu, on the contrary, he is a martial artist with a big pattern and a hero with a small pattern. At a critical juncture, he only wants to protect his beloved, and does not break through the normal feelings of human beings. Great gods such as Zhang Sanfeng and Wang Chongyang are all in a big pattern. Ordinary people can't achieve this level, and only one will emerge in hundreds of years.

Feng Yuxiu's position in the play is "Wu Shi", but I would rather call him "Wu Shi". My deepest impression and favorite Wu Chi is Master Cheng Guan in "The Deer and Ding Ding Ji". At that time, the part where he was teased by Wei Xiaobao was really cute, and he would laugh for a long time every time he watched it. It may be that he was deeply influenced by Mr. Jin Yong, and he always felt that "Wu Chi" should be like Zhou Botong and Cheng Guan, obsessed with martial arts, with good intentions, a childlike nature, and not indiscriminately killing innocents. As for Feng Yuxiu, it was ok when he started a life-and-death duel with major martial arts masters, but he was just a "wu idiot" who wanted to be the first in the world to die. After strangling his wife and killing the police, I couldn't understand it. , where is this for the pursuit of martial arts, in order to "make yourself stronger", it is clearly a big evil pen who has been dazzled by the number one in the world, and the more you look at it, the more you feel that it is inferior. In fact, Wang Baoqiang's acting is quite good. I used to see him as cute and naive. In this film, the eagerness for quick success and the evil spirit in his eyes, he played a Shake (a big idiot with a bad face) to life, very Thumbs up. In terms of martial arts or life, it is a small pattern, and it is difficult to achieve big things with a narrow vision. The identification is completed.

Although the people in the film are relatively narrow-minded, the heroes are not tall enough, and the villains are not vicious enough, the pattern of the film itself is still relatively high. I have feelings and conscience. I have said a little bit earlier, but I won't say much.

View more about Kung Fu Jungle reviews