Watching "Nanjing! Nanjing! ".
My first feeling was--"Shooting Chibi, big guy?"
The second feeling was--"Lu Chuan must become popular."
The whole story brought out several messages:
some national troops stayed to resist the Japanese army and fought in the streets , which made the Japanese army stunned, and indirectly led to the massacre of prisoners of war (this is also one of the Japanese right-wing arguments). The
Japanese army mainly killed prisoners of war, not civilians (this is also one of the Japanese right-wing arguments).
The commander of the Japanese army (who is the general in the picture ) No explanation) It seems that they want to maintain military discipline, so they set up comfort stations with good intentions (this is also one of the sayings of the Japanese right-wing). The
comfort women turned out to be voluntary (this is also one of the sayings of the Japanese right-wing). The
recruitment of Chinese comfort women is actually because There are not enough Japanese comfort women (this is also one of the sayings of the Japanese right-wing)
"China's Shutra" Mr. Rabe has become a useless person (see the Rabe Memorial Hall in Nanjing, "Rabe's Diary" and articles on the Internet to know Nanjing !Nanjing! How to dwarf him)
As for the issue of "from the perspective of a conscientious Japanese officer" that many people talk about, it is not a problem. Because of the hundreds of thousands of Japanese troops in Nanjing, there will always be those who are ashamed of killing, and it is not surprising that there are those who violate military discipline and release prisoners of war. I think Lu Chuan's filming of "Nanjing! Nanjing!" is not to incite ethnic hatred, but to sell human contradictions and unofficial views to get big hits.
Why do I say he is selling human contradictions and unofficial views? If the filming is closer to the historical facts (especially the high-level position of the Japanese army and Rabe's deeds), the so-called contradictions of human nature in the story will be much more reasonable. "Nanjing! Nanjing!" gave me the feeling that for the sake of the story to be good, anything can be changed, and historical facts can be ignored, just like Chibi. What for? is the best seller. In the mainland, taking a picture and handling the story is clever, but the position is very different from the official one, and it is not surprising that the historical events that play with tragic elements regardless of the historical facts are successful.
In fact, it is understandable to adapt historical events into interesting movie stories. However, if you want to deal with some national tragedies that are not too long ago and there are still survivors, respect for historical facts is necessary, which is for the living and the dead. respect.
Having said so much, I just want to remind everyone not to increase the director's income.
Finally, can anyone tell me why Mr. Tang wants to shoot without Lala? This part is really ridiculous.
Further reading:
"Nanjing! Nanjing! ” VS “Rabe Diary”, who is telling the historical facts?
Less relevant later words:
those lined up on the posters, the unheroic national army, turned out to be blocking other disintegrating national troops, not the Japanese army, and some people died tragically. Commander Tang Shengzhi left Nanjing, and the national army left in Nanjing collapsed. This is indeed a historical fact.
View more about City of Life and Death reviews
