whose Nanjing

Brionna 2022-04-21 09:03:53

Have you watched "Nanjing Nanjing"? I rely on, no exclamation mark! Don't fight. Nothing to sigh.

I watched the first scene (Xi'an) of Da Dao Lu's Nanjing, which was the only populist thing left in my bones.

More than 2 hours down, speechless.

Chatting with some friends, the ultimate question is mostly - whose Nanjing is this? Anyway, not the majority of Chinese working people.

Zhongquan played really well. It's hard to believe that this devil is actually a laid-off comrade in the entertainment industry in Japan. True color. Even the suicide episode I held back to believe. My own horse (belonging to the consensual type) was killed by my class compatriots, and no one could stand it. As for the No. 2 devil male lead, he is a typical hero created by Director Lu, a monster with Chinese characteristics.

When Lu Chuan came out to do the propaganda, he rounded his mouth and said that he wanted to tell the Chinese people that we also had resistance in Nanjing. The capital of a country was captured in three days, called resistance? More international than the lies of the great leaders. What's even more untechnical is that a few minutes of gunfights actually dare to say resistance in that context? The "capital" in the movie, if you don't watch it, you don't know that it's just this "vision" that is worth more than 100 million yuan.

Said that Lu Chuan had no vision, and I didn't believe the brothers of the Tan family were killed. The gun hunter belongs to Jiang Wen, and the Keke Xili belongs to Lu Chuan. Now the Internet is talking about what happened to Hoh Xil, which is a typical servile fall. I firmly defend the status of Hoh Xil as a Chinese film, and at the same time defend Lu Chuan's contribution to Hoh Xil.

1. This is a movie without a soul.
2. This is by no means the Nanjing that Hu Jiujiu made a fool of in the New Weekly. Either Hu Jiujiu lied to me, or Lu Chuan lied to Hu Jiujiu; also, I believe that what Wang Shuo watched and what we watched were by no means the same Nanjing, otherwise I would From then on, I despised Wang Shuo.
3. I can't figure out what movie sequelae Gao Yuanyuan has? Her performance inside was empty.
4. Jiang Yiyan was deliberately raised by Lu Chuan to highlight the incompetence of officials or Chinese men. But since then, the "resistance" that Lu Chuan cared about has turned sour, and the trembling legs are also resistance?
5. Rabe doesn't look like someone with a German ID.
6. Lu Chuan thought he was standing very high and looking down at all beings. This time he was wrong.
7. All the elites who said aloud after watching the samples are the ones with brain water. The common people who disdain to say that Nanjing is not good or fight fiercely to say that Nanjing is not good will ignore it.
8. This is a movie that wants to say that devils have souls. The drum-beating part is really shocking, and it is very suitable for right-wing devils to watch.
9. I admire the boldness of the Radio, Film and Television Bureau, and the idea of ​​reform is finally reflected in them; I am worried about the anti-social orthodoxy of the Chinese young and middle-aged elites represented by Lu Chuan. It must be explained that I am not worried about them. Behavior, but thinking—they only do the opposite, but nothing else. It's really sad to do things that you can't achieve; but the more you can't achieve it, the more you think you have achieved it, and you force others to believe that they have achieved it, otherwise people who don't believe it are ridiculous and even hateful. Those who say movies are just movies are 2B.
10. Lu Chuan said that what he wanted to reflect was the nature of war. It's a pity that the nature of the war in his films is the nature of the victor -- the victor is the devil -- the nature of war or the victor's philosophy of war. The nature of war that we most want to see, or I personally want to see most, is the nature of war of the losers—us who were slaughtered—or the philosophy of war of the losers. It's a pity that apart from being massacred or raped, I still can't jump out of this circle, but I get a lot of information. For example, this movie restores the real Nanjing Massacre and reflects the human nature that should be in war. This is a different perspective on the Nanjing Massacre. reviews of movies, etc.
11. Whose Nanjing is this? Nobody's. In a few years, even Lu Chuan will deny that this is his Nanjing.
12. What Promise brought me was entertainment, but Nanjing didn't bring me anything. Really speechless.

View more about City of Life and Death reviews

Extended Reading
  • Ryleigh 2022-04-20 09:02:58

    Nanjing Nanjing substitutes the perspective of Japanese soldiers, beautifying the Japanese devils and traitors, who are affectionate and righteous, pure and innocent. The effect of the shooting is: the Japanese devils will make you feel bad if they are shot, and it doesn't matter if the Chinese soldiers are killed like stepping on ants. The Chinese are expressionless walking dead. The comfort women were betrayed by the Chinese themselves. The commander of the Japanese army did not want the ghost soldiers to rape the women, so he urged the comfort station to be built as soon as possible. Being a traitor is also a last resort. If you see traitors in the future, don't beat or scold them. They are also good people, even martyrs. Westerners are moral role models angel saviors. In the end, the Chinese man and child were heartless and happy, but it was the Japanese soldier who committed suicide because of his conscience. From the shooting and approval of Nanjing Nanjing, we can see: where is the real enemy of the Chinese people.

  • Evan 2022-04-20 09:02:58

    Anyone who faces the subject of the national massacre should be cautious, but Lu Chuan's solo show in the second half basically reached the point of insanity. The Japanese soldier committed suicide because of atonement, making the real history deduced into a literary and artistic tone overflowing with human nature. In the course of history, no Japanese soldier has ever done this. The slaughtered did not need the slaughterer to say good things. It was excessively poetic, legendary, and spectacle, and found the wrong stage.