Deification, alienation, creation of information cocoon room, cognitive solidification, prejudice, kidnapping the ontology object
Self-satisfaction/fantasies, spiritual self-entertainment, addiction, lust
But it is not so uncomfortable to write Liao Zhai. Understand that it is probably expressing utopian fetters, but there is a layer of age difference - imprisonment - coercion of the active party relationship is the opposite, which is despised by a harmonious and equal society, and there is no basis for praise.
The girl is somewhat unclear about herself, and her behavior is contradictory. In general, her role is to serve the fantasy image (returning, crying, agreeing to marriage, and having sex)
Is this worthy of praise? Since the possession based on selfish desires is morally despised, and the extreme obsession of Stockholm is not seen, then the emotions that arise are the unilateral products of whose people. For unreasonable ignorance, no criticism/criticism, it seems to be nothing but praise for the kidnapper. In the film, the woman becomes an objective existence without self-awareness, praise and foil for imaginary "love", and even a fig leaf for copulation. It's up to women to do it. This is the fundamental difference between Lolita and Lolita. The thin-necked East Asian man is indeed a hungry and lustful madman.
The performance of "God" and "Fortune-telling" in the script is quite bright.
View more about The Bow reviews
