1. The deceased's lawyer went out after the first return and the second time he came back, did the security guard miss it? According to a statement from one of the security guards, I went to the toilet once, so what about the second time I came back?
2. But based on a single clue and a simple experiment, it was determined that the murderer was more than six feet tall and stood up and knocked to death the lawyer of the deceased, and then immediately disclosed it to the external media. Isn't it a bit of a joke? So before the comparison and interrogation of the two people, the female protagonist's confession was confirmed by the security guard to be a lie. What is the purpose of such a plot development?
3. The writer's confession said that the heroine and her lover framed him, so the candlestick must have the writer's bloodstain and the writer's head must be injured. Isn't such a confession broken without attack? Check it out, it's clear
4. The coffee table in the living room was not broken by the deceased's lawyer and his lover on July 30. When the male protagonist and the deceased's lawyer were fighting, they were broken again.
5. Also, I want to complain about whether the autopsy is really so random, what kind of shoes fit the feet, and the amount of medicine in the capsule, even professional forensic doctors can't check it out?
Turning on the Tucao mode is a bit unstoppable. The Indian police threshold is so low, it is irresponsible, and there is no thought; the turning point of shoes in rainy days is also very blunt...
View more about Ittefaq reviews
