Biggest bug in this movie

Who is telling the truth or a lie? I believe that the audience will have an indescribable taste when they see it at the end, as if they all believed that they felt that they knew the truth earlier! First of all, the wonderful thing about this movie is that often what you pay attention to makes you lose the focus of "line of sight". In-depth say that the rhythm is better controlled and the plot is more reasonable! The biggest breakthrough point is the physical evidence that has been tested by the relevant departments. At the same time, the "physical evidence" will also make people lose their basic judgment ability. I believe you have all heard the saying: what you see is not necessarily true, what you hear is not necessarily true, and what you see and hear may not be true either. I agree with the plot and reasoning of this film. Well, I won't talk nonsense, just say the biggest bug in the film, this bug may make you feel that this film has gone down a notch!
From the end of the film: the medicine and shoes provide important clues to determine the prisoner, especially the evidence of shoes. Maybe the murderer said at the end of the film: Unless you get the evidence, the UK won't do anything to me! The shoes identified the "murderer" and let go of the "murderer". I don't know if the "shoes" will continue to play a role in the end. After all, there is no explanation in the film at the end, but there must be DNA in the insoles of the shoes. This does not give the murderer a way to survive! We found that the majority of the film uses conversation or storytelling to get through the plot. From writers, cheating girls, cheating men, to challenge JC's judgment through storytelling, but also challenge the audience's IQ, I wonder if everyone pays attention? At a certain point, I think the biggest bug is from: 1: The plot of the cheating girl saying "the writer fights with her husband". 2: The plot of the cheating man saying: "He fights with the cheating husband himself". 3: On the plot behind the writer's entrance into the door of the cheating girl. I think most people overlook one thing: "glass". How and when did the glass break?
1: From the story of the cheating girl: the husband was broken when he fought with the writer when he came back. It was the glass that the husband broke, and the writer pushed
2: From the cheating man, it was broken when the husband came back to fight with him. It was the glass broken by the cheating man who pushed it to her husband.
3: From the writer's point of view: it will be broken as soon as you enter the door.
You can watch the clip of the video
To be honest: It is obvious that the confessions of the cheating woman and cheating man in this section are inconsistent, and they are the biggest suspects! I haven't seen this bug before the "shoe" evidence, which makes me sure that killing my husband is the crime of the two. After the "shoe" evidence appears, the film is somewhat contradictory, but overall the film is still good.

View more about Ittefaq reviews