The film uses the confessions of the father of the suicide woman, the detective who followed his wife's affair, the security guard who saw the lawyer and the deceased go home at 7:30, and the broken glass coffee table, the blood of various people found at the scene, stained Various evidences such as the shoes of the deceased in the mud, let us distinguish the Rashomon woven by the writer male suspect and the cheating female suspect! Although most of them are oral confessions, and the real evidence is almost non-existent, the suspense of the script is still pretty good! It presents a very good story, but at the end of the film, it is too low-level to reveal the truth through the writer's own narrative.
After watching the whole film, we already know that the truth of the facts, the writer lied all the way, and the wife of the deceased also concealed a little because she wanted to conceal the fact that she had cheated.
the truth:
The truth is that the writer came to India to promote his new book. Because the work did not reflect well, he leaked to the media the name of the raped girl he interviewed to write this book. Therefore, the girl was surrounded by the media and passers-by in various ways. The author's book is on fire. The girl could not bear the scorn of others and committed suicide. The writer's wife persuaded the writer to tell the police honestly that it was he who leaked the girl's name, but the writer refused to say anything.
Two days later, there will be a new book launch. The writer took advantage of the fact that his wife's congenital heart disease needs to take medicine every day, and secretly replaced the medicine that his wife was taking, and replaced each capsule with three times the original amount of medicine. On the day of the press conference, his wife was reluctant to attend his press conference. He was at home alone, took the medicine that the writer had changed in advance, and died of a heart attack. When the writer came home from the press conference, he saw his dead wife. His wife was designed to die by him. The cause of death was a natural death of a heart attack, and he was completely unsuspected.
After his wife died, he found a record of her text messages with the lawyer on his wife's mobile phone, which showed that the wife was going to sue the writer with the lawyer for leaking the name of the girl who was interviewed. He put away his wife's mobile phone and reported it. police. He thought that the police would take his wife away when he came and found out that it was a natural death, but the police had to take him back to the police station! Originally, it was nothing for him to follow the police back to the police station. After all, his wife died of natural causes under his own careful design, which had nothing to do with him, but he still carried his wife's mobile phone. The lawyer also knew about the writer's disclosure of the girl's name. Can't be taken away by the police!
As for the mobile phone, it’s easy to say, throw it away, or hide it anywhere, and it can be found when he returns from the police station, but the existence of a lawyer is definitely a threat, and the writer can’t escape! If he doesn't escape, he is such a famous writer, his wife died, and he was taken away by the police station. It is easy to be reported by the news. Once the lawyer sees the news report, he will immediately understand that he refuses to let his wife listen to him. He turned himself in to the police station. He leaked the girl's name, so he killed his wife! At that time, his carefully planned wife's death will be exposed! So he had to run away, go to the lawyer's house and kill the lawyer!
He fled all the way to the lawyer's house. At first, it seemed that he met the lawyer's wife by chance and entered his house by chance, but in fact, he had come to find a lawyer! Arrived at the lawyer's house, but found that the lawyer was not there! It started raining at 11 p.m. that night, and when he went to the lawyer's house, it was still raining outside, and his shoes were not stained with mud. When he arrived at the lawyer's house, the coffee table was indeed broken. He held the lawyer's wife hostage, but he didn't know what the lawyer looked like. But he saw a group photo of the lawyer and his wife on the computer desktop of the lawyer's home, and also found a photo of the lawyer's wife cheating with others.
That night, before 7:30, the lawyer's wife and the lawyer's friend were having an affair at his house. The lawyer suddenly returned home early at 7:30 and took the photos of his wife and friend's affair that he hired a detective before. The friend beat, and the glass coffee table shattered, leaving behind the blood of his wife's lover. After the wife's lover left, the lawyer and his wife also left after arguing for a while, but when the lawyer came back at 7:30, the security guard saw it from the surveillance camera. When he left, it was probably in the blind spot of the surveillance camera and was not photographed.
Because the wife was kidnapped by the writer, when the nanny came to clean, the wife chased her away. The lover also ran over again because she didn't answer many of her calls. How could she have received it? She has been held hostage by the writer, and she will definitely not be allowed to answer the phone. Should she be called to the police? Because he was kidnapped, his lover was also driven away by him. After that, he waited until about twelve o'clock in the evening when the lawyer returned home again and saw his wife being kidnapped by the writer, so he rushed to scuffle.
The lawyer and the writer were dealing with each other. Seeing that the wife could not help, she ran out to find the police, because she had seen the police investigating the case here before. By the time the police were brought by his wife, the writer had already killed the lawyer, and thoughtfully changed his shoes with the lawyer's. The police took the writer back to the police station, and the wife's mistress sent her to the police for a statement. A police officer in charge of their case came to interrogate. Because the writer is well-known and is from the United Kingdom, there was a lot of pressure from his superiors and he was only given three days.
During the interrogation, the wife kept telling the truth, and the wife's mistress just didn't want to expose her adultery with the lawyer's wife, lying that he wasn't there that day, and everything else was the truth. The writer made up a wonderful story. He broke into the lawyer's house by accident. The lawyer's wife was very friendly to him. The lawyer's wife was strange. The glass of the coffee table was broken, and the bedroom door was left open, deliberately implying that the police and lawyers His wife killed him! The lover of the lawyer's wife he said came over to impersonate the lawyer, and then knocked him unconscious. When he woke up, he found the lawyer dead beside him. The wife and her lover deliberately framed him!
In fact, I'm thinking, in fact, after killing the lawyer and changing his shoes, the writer has already laid out the whole story. After all, he is a suspense and detective novelist, and his mind is meticulous enough. Therefore, during the interrogation process, it was not the police who interrogated little by little, but the writer who led the police. In the first interrogation, he deliberately led the suspect to the lawyer's wife. Later, when he saw that he was arrested, he made up his wife and lover to pretend to be his wife. The lawyer knocked him out of the lie. Every time he is interrogated, he only talks about this, and he refuses to talk about it later. He will add other details next time. This is also normal!
In the end, the writer successfully led the police into the ditch, framed the lawyer's wife and lover and imprisoned him, cleared the suspicion by himself, and fled back to the UK on a plane.
The film is actually great, and there are no obvious bugs? Why do so many people think there is a bug? Are you sure the alibi of that lawyer's wife's lover is serious? The lover admitted that he lied after working one day and then coming home. He was actually cheating with the lawyer's wife at the lawyer's house! I just lied because I didn't want others to know about his immoral relationship with the lawyer's wife! Why did the police find out the photo of the lawyer's wife having an affair with someone else, but didn't use it! That's because, in this film, except for the police officer who is investigating the case, almost all the other police officers are fooling around! You don't see how stupid and lazy other police officers are, and they don't want to investigate cases at all. This also makes the police in India black out. They don't want to investigate cases at all. They just want to go to get off work, sleep, and leave work early. No need for truth at all!
I think this film is great, just like the hero in Invisible Guest, a super invincible scumbag full of lies! The case is also a bit like the invisible guest. It is a case with several other cases. The style is also similar, with several people describing their own version, creating a sense of Rashomon confusion, making people unable to tell what is true and what is false. However, this film is an adaptation of his old Indian film of the same name, which is much earlier than the invisible guest. It is said that the director of this film is also the grandson of the director of the original old film of the same name. It is a tribute to grandpa by the grandson. Come on, this film is highly finished, and there are not too many bugs! Many people say that these cases are coincidences, have you read them seriously? It's not a coincidence at all! It is the writer's on-the-spot performance. Even if the lawyer's wife did not have an affair with his lover, he would also make up another excuse to excuse the crime! Moreover, the suicide of the raped girl, the natural death of the wife, and the death of the lawyer are all linked together by the writer alone! It is said that when the writer killed, the wife was watching, and the wife ran out to call the police, because the wife had seen the police nearby before!
However, the film finally reveals the truth through the writer's own self-report, and there is hardly much evidence in the film, all relying on verbal reasoning, which is indeed a bit far-fetched, but in fact, the evidence is also critical enough, in fact, it can barely make sense.
Welcome to the pure original public account: fish pattern
View more about Ittefaq reviews
