Fairness and justice have been consistent for a long time, and only after experience has I realized that these two words are completely different from meaning to realization. The male protagonist was sentenced for killing an unarmed person on the battlefield. Can it be called justice? How many people can guarantee normal thinking in the case of the battlefield where they may die at any time? On other battlefields, how many seem to be Innocent people pull out bombs. The male protagonist was sentenced for humanitarian justice, so is it fair that the male protagonist, as a soldier, should live like an ordinary person?
The female lawyer obtains judicial justice by framing the male protagonist. Where is the justice that belongs to the male protagonist? In order to keep the correction from being known to the world, the authority has made the male protagonist bear crimes that he has never committed. Neither fairness nor justice is on the male protagonist's side. In the end, charile Fang uploaded the original edited video. Is it fair or just belated for the male protagonist? For the male protagonist who has pleaded guilty, except for his relatives, several people believe that he is innocent.
Is it justice to use fake video evidence to arrest terrorists? If there is no evidence to do nothing and allow terrorists to do evil, is it fair? Maybe this problem is really unsolvable, just like 6 unruly children playing on the normal railway, and one child playing on the abandoned railway, how do you turn the fork, what is the value to measure the so-called fairness and justice.
At the end of the episode, I have been monitoring other people's big boss frank for a few episodes. It turned out that he was also being monitored. It's fair, but what about justice?
Admiring the sharpness of the screenwriter, he pointed at the pain points everywhere, and threw a bunch of practical and philosophical unsolvable problems.
View more about The Capture reviews
