After the second brush, I felt the screenwriter's full of malice.. There are basically three situations that can be inferred in the fifth act: Laura committed suicide, Christie did it, and Jim did it. But because the assistant K (Christie) did not admit that he was the murderer, he also mentioned When Laura's death is Jim's price...the second case can be ruled out...Chrisie also mentioned, "Your career must come first" "You (Jim) explain to her (Laura) That's it", indicating that Laura's death should be between Acts 4 and 5 (that is, the initial upswing of Jim's career), and that Laura's cause of death hindered Jim's career. There are two situations: First, Laura wants to get married and Jim refuses (corresponding to J missing and dislikes L as a substitute and L's civilian cousin): It can be extended to L's disappointment and suicide and J to do it himself. Second, Jim wants to silence Laura? (Because J thought L designed to frame Tony and the manager?..) And Jim doesn't know how to explain Laura's death? One is that I really don't know (this assumption can be ruled out based on the maliciousness of the whole play..) The second is self-defense amnesia (this goes back to the two cases of Jim's murderer's amnesia and Laura's suicide shock..) In short... I always feel that the writer of this episode didn't give a clear answer.. Maybe it's because of my shallow knowledge? ? If the drama takes the "black swan" routine that goes too deep into the play... It seems that all the hallucinations are solvable? But this is too boring (not malicious enough →_→) (brain hole: If Laura in Act 4 is already Jim's hallucination...all assumptions will be overturned (*￣m￣))
ps. Secret No. 9 taught me to doubt everything (ﾉ_ _)ﾉ
View more about Inside No. 9 reviews
