"Silent Night" fits the name "Secret No. 9" very well, with house number nine, door nine, or room nine. What happened in Room 9, there are only people in Room 9. No one outside Room 9 knows what happened, so it is a secret. Secrets are kept secret and cannot be shared with outsiders. Everything that happened was closely related to the people in this room, and it was an internal matter that could not be known to outsiders. For example, in the first episode, only that family knew what happened, and only that family showed expressions when they heard the nursery rhyme of "Sardines". And in the quiet night of the second episode, only the people who appear in this room can know what will happen here. However, the danger is that you can't get out of the room. As long as you enter this room, you are forced to be involved in this incident, whether or not you were originally related to it, and you are destined to have a close relationship with the protagonist of this incident. Maybe, we as viewers, would say they are innocent and that they only had a relationship with this family by coincidence. However, there are too few real coincidences in this world. Behind the coincidences, it is actually inevitable. And that's because in any case, when you choose to have sex with this family, whether you are innocent or not, there is no other utility. Functionally, you can only get involved, and even give your life.
Well, speaking of "Quiet Night", although it is a comedy drama, it is actually a serious drama. The essence of humorous opera is the connotation of serious opera. Sometimes, humorous operas are more powerful than suju operas, but they are a bit more humorous than sujuju. If you just focus on the point of laughter, then laughter is laughter, nothing else. Su-ju can make people concentrate and care about the direction of Su-ju, and the audience will think about the fate of the characters in Su-ju, put themselves into it, and think if they encounter such a thing, whether there is any good solution, or Said still not. And comedy dramas set up reversals with rich smiles. In the reversal again and again, the audience is slowly drawn in. The comedy drama does not allow the audience to stop and think. It requires the audience to completely forget that they are watching a comedy drama. Therefore, as a movie, it sets up a screen between the movie and the audience. This screen does not allow the audience to substitute themselves into it and imitate the content. However, it will set up various contradictions. Although it is a reversal, if you think about it carefully, it is indeed the case, and it can only be the case. Life doesn't have a plan, it doesn't go according to plan, it's full of unexpected twists and turns, but it's just right. We just said that there is an encounter screen between the comedy opera and the audience, and the audience is not allowed to imitate the content. The setting of this screen can make the audience forget that what the humorous opera is performing is the impermanence and drama of real life. The world is like a stage, and life is like an actor. This is a familiar aphorism, but few people treat it. This is exactly what the comedy is trying to convey.
"Quiet Night" is not only a comedy, but also a mime. A mime, as the name suggests, has no voice for dialogue, and uses other voices or body movements to express the dialogue of the characters. What makes this mime different from other mimes is that at the end of the film, the voices of the characters appear. This is amazing and interesting. Why is there character dialogue. Is it because of the phone? Isn't it possible to send text messages over the phone? Why must the mime itself be broken through dialogue? This is a very abrupt behavior. Very incomprehensible. Moreover, the appearance of dialogue is inconsistent with the title's "Quiet Night". On the quiet night, most of the people have already gone to sleep, but the topics of theft, murder, transvestite, homosexuality and so on happened here. This is a very different picture, always giving people a very abrupt feeling, or rather, dog blood. However, the plot of dog blood not only did not make the audience sneer at it, but relished it, which is also a very unusual thing to think about. To say that this is a black drama is not bad. But why are black and drama linked together? Wouldn't it be more appropriate to call it a serious drama? Or to say that it was originally a bloody-themed thriller, which is apt.
The behavior of the people in the play, every scene is so strange and funny at the same time. For example, at the beginning, the behavior of two thieves outside the house. The family they want to steal should be a rich family. So why is there no security? Why did the dog show up later, not now? Is this logical? Secondly, when the owner of the house and his lover were quarreling outside the house, the owner of the house turned around several times. Is it really because he was irritable that he couldn't see what was happening in the house? It's hard to figure out, totally incomprehensible. In other words, none of this is logical. What's even more illogical is that, towards the end of the film, a cleaner came. On a night when most of the people had already slept, a household cleaner came to the door. Isn't this something suspicious? Could it be explained that it was because the male protagonist killed his lover that he couldn't think because of panic, is that really the case? All this is too illogical. The furniture cleaner was a killer who came to steal the pictures, and so were the two thieves. However, the relationship between the master and the lover is not because of pictures.
Therefore, there are two main lines in the whole film. The first main line is the painting, and the second main line is the relationship between the hero and the lover. These two main lines seem to be the last interlaced in the usual time and space. It doesn't seem that simple. Can these two seemingly contradictory main lines be summarized into one main line? What are we missing? Yes, the babysitter. We ignore the babysitter from beginning to end, as if the babysitter was a very inconspicuous character placed randomly on the show. But is it really so? If it is really inconspicuous, why does the nanny appear in the play? This is too illogical. So, a bold guess, a logical thing, this incident was planned by the nanny! Even if it was not planned by the nanny, it can be said that the nanny has always been involved in this matter. From beginning to end, the nanny is like a hidden person, controlling all this.
First of all, the first question is why the two thieves knew that the house had paintings. The second question is, does the nanny know about the relationship between the male host and his lover? The third question, who is the cleaner killer on the phone with. Thinking about it carefully, it seems that these things can be strung together, that is, the line of nanny. In such a big house, there is only one nanny, the master and the lover, and no one else? When the host is quarreling with his lover, does the nanny really not hear? The thief entered the house and the nanny really didn't find it? The painting fell to the ground. Didn't the nanny find the dropped painting when she was cleaning up the veil? Does she not know this painting? impossible. As a nanny, shouldn't you be aware of the placement of anything in the house? If you say you don't know or notice, it's hard to believe. Moreover, when the thief stunned the nanny, the nanny just hummed, but did not resist. Doesn't this feel weird? Moreover, the nanny was the only person in the house who was alone. She didn't die, she was just blinded. As a killer, brother killer, shouldn't we find out how many people there are at least in this room? Shouldn't you be sure after killing someone if everyone in this room is dead? As a killer, it would be too unprofessional. Besides, after the man killed his lover, when he dragged his lover's body, wouldn't there be blood on the ground? When the hostess took the cleaning tools and returned to the room, did the little brother really not pay attention to the blood on the ground? The little brother should have gone to see it, and found that it was the body of the man's lover in this room. Even if it is not known that the corpse is the lover of the male owner, the photos of the male owner and the lover can help the killer to conclude that they are closely related, and as a killer, this information must be grasped at the first time.
Looking at these details and information, I can't help but suspect that there must be some kind of relationship between the killer and the nanny, and it is a very close relationship.
In the end, the biggest beneficiary is the nanny, which is not wrong, but why it is a nanny, you need to think about it.
The mantis catches the cicada, the oriole is behind, and there is a larger bird behind the oriole. Human biological chain is no different from animal biological chain. In comparison, human biological chain is more sophisticated and complex.
View more about Inside No. 9 reviews
